Comic #2250
Where does your pillow talk fit in that chart?
I'm definitely an empirical absolutist. I quantify the quality of sexual pleasure compared to other sex acts using an equation with a set number of variables:
t = time (total time of sexual intercourse)
f = foreplay desire (how intense was the desire to have sex with a 1 to 10 scale)
i = intensity of orgasm (same 1 to 10 scale used to measure pain but with very awkward faces)
w = work (how hard did I have to work on a 1 to 10 scale)
d = total number of diverse sexual acts performed (doggy style, reverse cowgirl, french connection, etc. on a 1 to 10 scale on number of attacks. Anything greater than 10 is considered still to be a 10)
c = intensity of concentration on the sex (Did you have to think about Margaret Thatcher playing baseball in cold rain to maintain performance?) on a 1 to 10 scale
s = shame (more shame being a 10, less shame being a 1)
n = number of partners (1 to 10, where 1 is just you)
a = attractiveness of sum of partners
sexual pleasure = ((i + f - w + d + c - s + n + a) * t) / 100
So the values for my last session went as follows):
t = 7 minutes
f = 6
i = 6
w = 7
d = 3
c = 6
s = 8
n = 2
a = 7
So..
((6 + 6 - 7 + 3 + 6 - 8 + 2 + 7) * 7) / 100
(15 * 7) / 100
105 / 100
1.05
With a normal range of 0.99 to 1.21 (t-score
), I'm 95% confident that my sexual pleasure was within the normal range.
"Hey baby, that was average. Ohhhh yeaahhhh."
[url=http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&id=2250#comic]Comic #2250[/url]
[b]Where does your pillow talk fit in that chart?[/b]
I'm definitely an empirical absolutist. I quantify the quality of sexual pleasure compared to other sex acts using an equation with a set number of variables:
t = time (total time of sexual intercourse)
f = foreplay desire (how intense was the desire to have sex with a 1 to 10 scale)
i = intensity of orgasm (same 1 to 10 scale used to measure pain but with very awkward faces)
w = work (how hard did I have to work on a 1 to 10 scale)
d = total number of diverse sexual acts performed (doggy style, reverse cowgirl, french connection, etc. on a 1 to 10 scale on number of attacks. Anything greater than 10 is considered still to be a 10)
c = intensity of concentration on the sex (Did you have to think about Margaret Thatcher playing baseball in cold rain to maintain performance?) on a 1 to 10 scale
s = shame (more shame being a 10, less shame being a 1)
n = number of partners (1 to 10, where 1 is just you)
a = attractiveness of sum of partners
sexual pleasure = ((i + f - w + d + c - s + n + a) * t) / 100
So the values for my last session went as follows):
t = 7 minutes
f = 6
i = 6
w = 7
d = 3
c = 6
s = 8
n = 2
a = 7
So..
((6 + 6 - 7 + 3 + 6 - 8 + 2 + 7) * 7) / 100
(15 * 7) / 100
105 / 100
1.05
With a normal range of 0.99 to 1.21 (t-score :cry:), I'm 95% confident that my sexual pleasure was within the normal range.
"Hey baby, that was average. Ohhhh yeaahhhh."