by CARS » Tue Jun 07, 2011 8:49 pm
Dude wrote:I like how he cited an academic paper he knew no one would bother reading... Such a mastermind!
Because of this, I decided to take a little look at the cited paper, and, while looking over the abstract on secondary sexual traits, I couldn't stop thinking about cars. Human males, and cars.
"Secondary sexual traits under sexual selection are predicted to be related to male phenotype, because only high-quality males should be capable of developing these costly and exaggerated traits. Therefore, high-quality males should have
larger or more elaborate secondary sexual traits than poor-quality males."
[quote="Dude"]I like how he cited an academic paper he knew no one would bother reading... Such a mastermind![/quote]
Because of this, I decided to take a little look at the cited paper, and, while looking over the abstract on secondary sexual traits, I couldn't stop thinking about cars. Human males, and cars.
"Secondary sexual traits under sexual selection are predicted to be related to male phenotype, because only high-quality males should be capable of developing these costly and exaggerated traits. Therefore, high-quality males should have
larger or more elaborate secondary sexual traits than poor-quality males."