[2011-Oct-03] Sponch!

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :?: :idea: :| (o~o) :geek: :[] :geek2: :][>:=~+:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: [2011-Oct-03] Sponch!

Re: [2011-Oct-03] Sponch!

Post by Frostbite » Tue Oct 04, 2011 7:15 pm

I only use my gold plated guns for bling. I can get them gold plated because of all that oil money I have.

Re: [2011-Oct-03] Sponch!

Post by Eisbreaker » Tue Oct 04, 2011 7:10 pm

Oh. I thought guns qualify as 'bling' in Texas.

Re: [2011-Oct-03] Sponch!

Post by Frostbite » Tue Oct 04, 2011 7:08 pm

Well yeah. Why else would I have all these guns?

Re: [2011-Oct-03] Sponch!

Post by Eisbreaker » Tue Oct 04, 2011 7:06 pm

Frostbite wrote:Living in Texas I have to cross barren desert land filled with poisonous rattlesnakes every time I leave my hose. Shoes are a necessity.

Are they made of previously vanquished rattlesnakes?

Re: [2011-Oct-03] Sponch!

Post by Frostbite » Tue Oct 04, 2011 4:44 pm

Living in Texas I have to cross barren desert land filled with poisonous rattlesnakes every time I leave my house. Shoes are a necessity.

Re: [2011-Oct-03] Sponch!

Post by Eisbreaker » Tue Oct 04, 2011 4:26 pm

Why would you want to wear service?*

*Or shoes, or shirts, for that matter.

Re: [2011-Oct-03] Sponch!

Post by Frostbite » Tue Oct 04, 2011 3:32 pm

Eisbreaker wrote:No shirts, no shoes, no service.


Wait...wouldn't it be no shirt, no shoes, yes service?

Re: [2011-Oct-03] Sponch!

Post by Sahan » Tue Oct 04, 2011 6:35 am

And thankfully, there is no mention of pants in the policy.

Re: [2011-Oct-03] Sponch!

Post by DonRetrasado » Tue Oct 04, 2011 5:03 am

Lucky for me, that's all I wear.

Re: [2011-Oct-03] Sponch!

Post by Eisbreaker » Tue Oct 04, 2011 5:02 am

No shirts, no shoes, no service.

Re: [2011-Oct-03] Sponch!

Post by GUTCHUCKER » Mon Oct 03, 2011 11:04 pm

Your second mistake is do not talk about fight club.

Re: [2011-Oct-03] Sponch!

Post by Lethal Interjection » Mon Oct 03, 2011 8:43 pm

pigslookfunny wrote:http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&id=2387#comic

I actually bought a box of Sponch from Walmart last year. It wasn't very good, to be honest. I guess now I know why.


Your first mistake was buying it from Walmart.

Re: [2011-Oct-03] Sponch!

Post by Jacob » Mon Oct 03, 2011 6:04 pm

The reason the comic is not successful is because he's taking his criticisms of the media too far, so it results in a bunch of easy punches.

Re: [2011-Oct-03] Sponch!

Post by Guest » Mon Oct 03, 2011 5:47 pm

This is more about how the media can spin real objective truths into the questionable. The power of denial is amazing.

Re: [2011-Oct-03] Sponch!

Post by Guest » Mon Oct 03, 2011 5:26 pm

Anita Johnson? Was that a coincidence?

Top