[2011-Oct-02] Induction

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :?: :idea: :| (o~o) :geek: :[] :geek2: :][>:=~+:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: [2011-Oct-02] Induction

Re: [2011-Oct-02] Induction

by Oldrac the Chitinous » Wed Oct 05, 2011 12:36 am

'cause wouldn't be so embarrassing if they found out the real reason?

Re: [2011-Oct-02] Induction

by Lethal Interjection » Tue Oct 04, 2011 9:14 pm

Frostbite wrote:I don't know about you, but I don't remember a time when I was hoping to see full frontal nudity from a small child.

Or you know...any nudity at all from a child.

Awesome. Now I'm on a government watch list.
Or rather, now you have a reason that you can tell people.

Re: [2011-Oct-02] Induction

by Frostbite » Tue Oct 04, 2011 5:34 pm

I don't know about you, but I don't remember a time when I was hoping to see full frontal nudity from a small child.

Or you know...any nudity at all from a child.

Awesome. Now I'm on a government watch list.

[2011-Oct-02] Induction

by bmathguy » Tue Oct 04, 2011 5:27 pm

http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&id=2386


I'm just wondering, if he showed her a priori, why do we only see him a posteriori?

Top