[2012-Mar-17] Marriage

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :?: :idea: :| (o~o) :geek: :[] :geek2: :][>:=~+:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: [2012-Mar-17] Marriage

Re: [2012-Mar-17] Marriage

by caffi123rein » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:43 am

Nice one! Nicely done! The completion and success of any event depends on the venue, I just recommend [url=http://eventup.com/venues/malibu-ca/wedding/]wedding venues malibu[/url] to all because I have visited venues from their lists and they were all awesome.

Re: [2012-Mar-17] Marriage

by jenny_8 » Thu Apr 04, 2013 9:30 am

Wedding plans should be made few months ago the reception. You can hire a wedding planner for help.
[url=http://eventup.com/venues/malibu-ca/wedding/]malibu wedding venues[/url]

Re: [2012-Mar-17] Marriage

by Guest » Wed Mar 21, 2012 8:00 am

those with none are probably not married. Or just really hot trophy wives, possibly conning their husbands into believing they picked 2.

Re: [2012-Mar-17] Marriage

by Sprinkles » Tue Mar 20, 2012 5:18 pm

Well yeah, the rule is they can't have all three, but any combination of 2 or less. Which is 7.

Re: [2012-Mar-17] Marriage

by Sahan » Tue Mar 20, 2012 2:38 pm

I don't think we are counting on anyone to have all 3 traits. So let's say 7.

Re: [2012-Mar-17] Marriage

by Kimra » Tue Mar 20, 2012 2:36 pm

Eight if someone had none of them though.

Re: [2012-Mar-17] Marriage

by Sprinkles » Tue Mar 20, 2012 1:06 pm

It would be 7, but not because I forgot about having none of the traits, I simply forgot to do all three of the versions of one trait.

Re: [2012-Mar-17] Marriage

by Sahan » Tue Mar 20, 2012 12:42 pm

Do we also count them if they have none of the traits? That would would give us a whopping seven different personality combinations for a wife to have.

Re: [2012-Mar-17] Marriage

by Sprinkles » Tue Mar 20, 2012 12:24 pm

Not every wife has two of the traits, as we've seen it is possible for them to only have two.

Re: [2012-Mar-17] Marriage

by Sahan » Tue Mar 20, 2012 12:14 pm

Well, I was assuming every wife had exactly two of those traits, and it didn't matter what order they were in, so 3 possibilites.

NO, STOP MAKING ME ONE OF THEM! CURSE YOU SPRINKLES.

Re: [2012-Mar-17] Marriage

by Sprinkles » Tue Mar 20, 2012 11:41 am

There are 6 possible identities.

Re: [2012-Mar-17] Marriage

by Sahan » Tue Mar 20, 2012 11:31 am

Everyone future wife goes in with a variety of characteristic traits, and walks out as one of the three possible identities.

Re: [2012-Mar-17] Marriage

by Kaharz » Tue Mar 20, 2012 11:26 am

I don't think pot luck is the phrase you are looking for. That would mean there was multiple wives each bringing their own characteristics. Or maybe you do...

Re: [2012-Mar-17] Marriage

by Crunchy Pete » Tue Mar 20, 2012 8:21 am

This was Crunchy Pete's introduction to this saying

do prospective wives know which of the two they are aiming for, or is it pot-luck?

Re: [2012-Mar-17] Marriage

by moefh » Mon Mar 19, 2012 6:05 am

apost wrote:What's the pun?
"Pick two" is usually understood as "pick two options from these three", but he's saying he meant "pick option number two (great lover)".

Top