[2012-Mar-23] Erectus Nocturnus

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :?: :idea: :| (o~o) :geek: :[] :geek2: :][>:=~+:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: [2012-Mar-23] Erectus Nocturnus

Re: [2012 March 23] Erectus Nocturnus

Post by ckelly » Sat Jun 02, 2012 5:38 am

ATGGAATAA wrote:There would be no change in gravitational attraction due to increased wang volume, it only represents a relocation of blood rather than a gain of mass.


Gravitational attraction depends on distance in addition to mass, so relocation has an effect, albeit completely inconsequential.

Re: [2012 March 23] Erectus Nocturnus

Post by Kaharz » Fri Apr 06, 2012 11:22 am

Lethal Interjection wrote:The Sarcasmatron isn't even plugged in.


Well of course not. It is the only known example of an actual perpetual motion machine.

Re: [2012 March 23] Erectus Nocturnus

Post by Lethal Interjection » Fri Apr 06, 2012 2:44 am

No, that's the Orgasmatron.

The Sarcasmatron isn't even plugged in.

Re: [2012 March 23] Erectus Nocturnus

Post by thejakeman » Thu Apr 05, 2012 5:44 pm

"Sir! The Sarcasmotron is fizzing and emitting sparks!"

Re: [2012 March 23] Erectus Nocturnus

Post by DonRetrasado » Wed Apr 04, 2012 7:29 am

ATGGAATAA wrote:There would be no change in gravitational attraction due to increased wang volume, it only represents a relocation of blood rather than a gain of mass.

I haven't thought of this. Could you continue for a few pages?

Re: [2012 March 23] Erectus Nocturnus

Post by Oldrac the Chitinous » Wed Apr 04, 2012 2:25 am

Surely if that were the case, someone would have said something by now.

Re: [2012 March 23] Erectus Nocturnus

Post by Lethal Interjection » Wed Apr 04, 2012 1:50 am

ATGGAATAA wrote:There would be no change in gravitational attraction due to increased wang volume, it only represents a relocation of blood rather than a gain of mass.


Really?

Re: [2012 March 23] Erectus Nocturnus

Post by ATGGAATAA » Wed Apr 04, 2012 12:47 am

There would be no change in gravitational attraction due to increased wang volume, it only represents a relocation of blood rather than a gain of mass.

Re: [2012 March 23] Erectus Nocturnus

Post by Sprinkles » Thu Mar 29, 2012 11:02 pm

Wouldn't even have to kill them, just make them less sexy. Of course, this is the sexiest person alive, so.


I don't know how yo gon do dat!

Re: [2012 March 23] Erectus Nocturnus

Post by Dane Raider » Thu Mar 29, 2012 10:45 pm

ChaoticBrain wrote:Of course! Just come back once you've achieved that, and the points are yours.


Cool. Well, I know I must be at least 2nd sexiest already, so who do I have to kill to fill their boots?

This is going to be easy.

Re: [2012 March 23] Erectus Nocturnus

Post by ChaoticBrain » Thu Mar 29, 2012 10:23 pm

Dane Raider wrote:Do I get any points for being sexiest?


Of course! Just come back once you've achieved that, and the points are yours.

Re: [2012 March 23] Erectus Nocturnus

Post by Dane Raider » Thu Mar 29, 2012 6:19 pm

Do I get any points for being sexiest?

Re: [2012 March 23] Erectus Nocturnus

Post by Sprinkles » Thu Mar 29, 2012 4:15 pm

I'm a sexist too. Remember you can't have exist, without sexist.

Re: [2012 March 23] Erectus Nocturnus

Post by Crunchy Pete » Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:47 pm

smiley_cow wrote:But...I am a sexist.


Oh.

Re: [2012 March 23] Erectus Nocturnus

Post by smiley_cow » Wed Mar 28, 2012 6:18 pm

But...I am a sexist.

Top

cron