[2012-Sep-27] Literally

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :?: :idea: :| (o~o) :geek: :[] :geek2: :][>:=~+:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: [2012-Sep-27] Literally

Re: [2012-September-27] Literally

by yeah, but » Sat Sep 29, 2012 10:58 am

Plus, she's got huge boobs

Re: [2012-September-27] Literally

by DragonDave » Fri Sep 28, 2012 6:49 pm

Please.

Computer scientists would be told "You SHOULD wear a condom", using the definition from RFC 2119:

3. SHOULD This word, or the adjective "RECOMMENDED", mean that there
may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore a
particular item, but the full implications must be understood and
carefully weighed before choosing a different course.

... which seems entirely correct in this instance!

Re: [2012-September-27] Literally

by UserNameDoesntMatter » Fri Sep 28, 2012 5:03 pm

These CS jokes get kinda lame. I understand it, but man it is mush quality.

[2012-Sep-27] Literally

by Aerogen » Thu Sep 27, 2012 7:26 am

That's a factoid!

Top