[2013-Jan-12]

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :?: :idea: :| (o~o) :geek: :[] :geek2: :][>:=~+:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: [2013-Jan-12]

Re: 2013-Jan-12

by Lethal Interjection » Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:41 pm

Gila Monster wrote:.....that hasn't happened already?
This.

Re: 2013-Jan-12

by Gila Monster » Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:28 pm

.....that hasn't happened already?

Re: 2013-Jan-12

by Peon » Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:18 pm

The time is rapidly approaching when all of Zach's comics are rehashes of his previous comics.

[2013-Jan-12]

by ReasonablyDoubtful » Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:53 pm

http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?id=2853#comic

What's amusing to me is not the comic in and of itself, but the fact that Zach has used arguments like this in previous SMBC comics:

http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&id=2230

And I'm guessing his position on the absolute truth of this claim still remains firm.

Top