[2014-Jan-05] Webster's Dicktionary

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :?: :idea: :| (o~o) :geek: :[] :geek2: :][>:=~+:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: [2014-Jan-05] Webster's Dicktionary

Re: [2013-Jan-05] Webster's Dicktionary

by Zeissmann » Tue Jan 07, 2014 5:40 pm

Me wrote:2014 not 2013
You're welcome.

Re: [2013-Jan-05] Webster's Dicktionary

by Kimra » Tue Jan 07, 2014 12:34 am

Me wrote:2014 not 2013
*pins a medal on Sherlock, and still doesn't care to fix it*

Re: [2013-Jan-05] Webster's Dicktionary

by Me » Mon Jan 06, 2014 7:24 pm

2014 not 2013

Re: [2013-Jan-05] Webster's Dicktionary

by Kimra » Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:56 am

Are you saying sometimes you open the dictionary in such an excitable way that you require it to be three times as large?

Also, PG effect, could just be a Smilesworth. But I suppose that doesn't make people laugh.*


*You made me read the comic. I hate you.

[2014-Jan-05] Webster's Dicktionary

by Zeissmann » Sun Jan 05, 2014 5:32 pm

This actually makes a lot of sense. We should lobby Webster to include this word in the next edition of their DICKtionary. :lol:

Top