[2019-04-04] Dogs 2

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :?: :idea: :| (o~o) :geek: :[] :geek2: :][>:=~+:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: [2019-04-04] Dogs 2

Re: [2019-04-04] Dogs 2

by the lost man » Mon Apr 08, 2019 5:31 pm

HikaruYami wrote:Either Zach is indicating that dogs are incredibly bad at math, or he accidentally inverted dog years and decided that a "dog lifetime" is 7 human years.

I've never heard of a dog dying from directly age-related causes at younger than 11, and also never heard of a human dying at older than 132. 84 seems most likely what he was going for....
to be fair, have you even seen any dogs who are good at math?

[2019-04-04] Dogs 2

by HikaruYami » Thu Apr 04, 2019 1:30 pm

Either Zach is indicating that dogs are incredibly bad at math, or he accidentally inverted dog years and decided that a "dog lifetime" is 7 human years.

I've never heard of a dog dying from directly age-related causes at younger than 11, and also never heard of a human dying at older than 132. 84 seems most likely what he was going for....

Top