[2016-11-02] naming-trends

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :?: :idea: :| (o~o) :geek: :[] :geek2: :][>:=~+:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: [2016-11-02] naming-trends

Re: [2016-11-02] naming-trends

Post by Apocalyptus » Wed Nov 16, 2016 6:59 am

jjjiiimmm wrote:I love the pundits. They should be only allowed on based on past truthful performance and should be hooked to a polygraph with electroshock feedback.

That's assuming polygraphs measure if someone is telling the truth, which they don't.

Re: [2016-11-02] naming-trends

Post by Sahan » Fri Nov 11, 2016 1:26 am

Oh boy, you're going to be in a world of trouble if you ever fall down a well.

Re: [2016-11-02] naming-trends

Post by Guest » Thu Nov 10, 2016 1:32 pm

this is just tikki tikki tembo no sa rembo chari bari ruchi pip peri pembo

Re: [2016-11-02] naming-trends

Post by jjjiiimmm » Fri Nov 04, 2016 11:04 am

I love the pundits. They should be only allowed on based on past truthful performance and should be hooked to a polygraph with electroshock feedback.

[2016-11-02] naming-trends

Post by ragnarokio » Thu Nov 03, 2016 7:59 pm


Top

cron