Nine-eleven was an inside job !

Sorry TigerCrew, but she bribed me better than you did.

Moderators: GreenCrayon, Lethal Interjection, Kimra, Oldrac the Chitinous, Amerika, Cirtur, Kisai, Astrogirl, Kovvy, carbonstealer, Apocalyptus, PyroPrav, Felstaff, smiley_cow, Sahan, Euclidthegreek, Kaharz, Asherian, FengharTheNord

User avatar
Jim Garrison
Posts: 17
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2012 1:14 am

Re: Nine-eleven was an inside job !

Post by Jim Garrison »

[quote="Administrator/moderator/witless bullshiter pretending to be Jim Garrison"]After reading all the very convincing arguments that you have posted here, I have been forced to conclude that I was wrong about the attacks on the World Trade Center. I hereby accept the findings of the NIST commission as accurate and complete, and recant all my previous statements to the contrary. This will be my final word on the subject, and anything I say later about it should be disregarded.

Thank you for your time, and God Bless America.[/quote]

That one I didn't expect, so thank you for being less predictible. Will you also delete what I write now ?

Peon wrote:
> I read this topic but I didn't see where you "disproved" the simpler theory by observation
> and experiment.

First post, second link, 2 hours of evidence. I didn't prove or disprove anything but 1500 experts agreed on the conclusion that the official version doesn't resist a critical examination. The demonstration even allows you to understand the key problems and form your own opinion.
Last edited by Jim Garrison on Thu Dec 13, 2012 7:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
GUTCHUCKER
Gotchucker's less handsome twin
Posts: 2126
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 2:26 am
Location: Paradise City?

Re: Nine-eleven was an inside job !

Post by GUTCHUCKER »

Image
Datanazush wrote:I ship Mohammed and Jehova.

User avatar
DonRetrasado
los más retrasadadados
Posts: 2845
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 6:27 am
Location: ¡Canadia!

Re: Nine-eleven was an inside job !

Post by DonRetrasado »

Jim Garrison wrote:
Myself, earlier in the thread, wrote:After reading all the very convincing arguments that you have posted here, I have been forced to conclude that I was wrong about the attacks on the World Trade Center. I hereby accept the findings of the NIST commission as accurate and complete, and recant all my previous statements to the contrary. This will be my final word on the subject, and anything I say later about it should be disregarded.

Thank you for your time, and God Bless America.
That one I didn't expect, so thank you for being less predictible. Will you also delete what I write now ?

Peon wrote:
> I read this topic but I didn't see where you "disproved" the simpler theory by observation
> and experiment.

First post, second link, 2 hours of evidence. I didn't prove or disprove anything but 1500 experts agreed on the conclusion that the official version doesn't resist a critical examination. The demonstration even allows you to understand the key problems and form your own opinion.
Hang on, first you say that you were wrong, and now you're back on the argument? What's going on here??
Astrogirl wrote:Lethal, nobody wants to know about your herpes.
Lethal Interjection wrote:That's good to know. I can avoid a few awkward phone calls now.

User avatar
Sahan
"I promise you no penis jokes."
Posts: 4361
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 6:20 am
Location: Perth, Australia
Contact:

Re: Nine-eleven was an inside job !

Post by Sahan »

I'm starting to think Jim may have a split personality or something of that sort. Maybe we should go a little easy on him.
Destructicus wrote: Alt text:
"I wonder if chemists feel bad that they're always left out of these sorts of jokes."

Since when is chemistry not a science?

User avatar
Jim Garrison
Posts: 17
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2012 1:14 am

Re: Nine-eleven was an inside job !

Post by Jim Garrison »

Hey guys, my mind is really blown by this whole 2=3 thing. Could you explain please ?

User avatar
smiley_cow
polite but murderous
Posts: 6508
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 6:15 pm
Location: The vast and desolate prairies

Re: Nine-eleven was an inside job !

Post by smiley_cow »

Jim Garrison wrote:Hey guys, my mind is really blown by this whole 2=3 thing. Could you explain please ?
I still don't understand why you keep saying there were only 3 WTC buildings. And I did. It was debris and fire from the nearby twin towers collapsing. They were all pretty close.
DonRetrasado wrote:Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow? I chose something different. I chose the impossible. I chose... Bitcoin.

User avatar
Gilligan
Posts: 65
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 5:37 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: Nine-eleven was an inside job !

Post by Gilligan »

sup guys?
Go tell your alien brothers that Ronnie Cordova says they're GAY!
AHMETxRock wrote:If there isn't a little boy sitting on my shoulders tweaking my nipples constantly I just CAN'T get off.

User avatar
Peon
Posts: 96
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2012 8:12 pm

Re: Nine-eleven was an inside job !

Post by Peon »

practicin some math

if we suppose that 2=3

then 2+2=2+3=3+2=3+3

therefore 4=5=6


corollary: 2+2=5
Ask the next question.

User avatar
Jim Garrison
Posts: 17
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2012 1:14 am

Re: Nine-eleven was an inside job !

Post by Jim Garrison »

smiley_cow wrote:
> I still don't understand why you keep saying there were only 3 WTC buildings. And
> I did. It was debris and fire from the nearby twin towers collapsing. They were
> all pretty close.

So the cause of the collapse is definitely not the collision with a plane. Because FYI that's the issue here.

User avatar
DonRetrasado
los más retrasadadados
Posts: 2845
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 6:27 am
Location: ¡Canadia!

Re: Nine-eleven was an inside job !

Post by DonRetrasado »

Jim Garrison wrote:smiley_cow wrote:
> I still don't understand why you keep saying there were only 3 WTC buildings. And
> I did. It was debris and fire from the nearby twin towers collapsing. They were
> all pretty close.

So the cause of the collapse is definitely not the collision with a plane. Because FYI that's the issue here.
you have a fascinating interpretation of sentences
Astrogirl wrote:Lethal, nobody wants to know about your herpes.
Lethal Interjection wrote:That's good to know. I can avoid a few awkward phone calls now.

User avatar
Jim Garrison
Posts: 17
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2012 1:14 am

Re: Nine-eleven was an inside job !

Post by Jim Garrison »

DonRetrasado wrote:
> you have a fascinating interpretation of sentences

Your 2=3 logical axiom is fascinating to me, so I guess the obvious meaning of a simple sentence must also be to you.

User avatar
DonRetrasado
los más retrasadadados
Posts: 2845
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 6:27 am
Location: ¡Canadia!

Re: Nine-eleven was an inside job !

Post by DonRetrasado »

are you coming onto me?
Astrogirl wrote:Lethal, nobody wants to know about your herpes.
Lethal Interjection wrote:That's good to know. I can avoid a few awkward phone calls now.

User avatar
GUTCHUCKER
Gotchucker's less handsome twin
Posts: 2126
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 2:26 am
Location: Paradise City?

Re: Nine-eleven was an inside job !

Post by GUTCHUCKER »

Image
Datanazush wrote:I ship Mohammed and Jehova.

User avatar
smiley_cow
polite but murderous
Posts: 6508
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 6:15 pm
Location: The vast and desolate prairies

Re: Nine-eleven was an inside job !

Post by smiley_cow »

DonRetrasado wrote:
Jim Garrison wrote:smiley_cow wrote:
> I still don't understand why you keep saying there were only 3 WTC buildings. And
> I did. It was debris and fire from the nearby twin towers collapsing. They were
> all pretty close.

So the cause of the collapse is definitely not the collision with a plane. Because FYI that's the issue here.
you have a fascinating interpretation of sentences
Man, I am so confused right now.
DonRetrasado wrote:Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow? I chose something different. I chose the impossible. I chose... Bitcoin.

User avatar
Edminster
Tested positive for Space-AIDS
Posts: 8832
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 9:53 pm
Location: Internet
Contact:

Re: Nine-eleven was an inside job !

Post by Edminster »

I think he's saying that because at least one building in the WTC was not destroyed via high-speed insertion of an airliner, none of them were.
ol qwerty bastard wrote:bitcoin is backed by math, and math is intrinsically perfect and logically consistent always

gödel stop spreading fud

Post Reply