Gays have literally destroyed the institution of marriage.

Frostbite · Post by **Frostbite** » Fri Nov 20, 2009 6:30 pm

I meant that he posted the video of the joke.

Post by **Edminster** » Fri Nov 20, 2009 6:33 pm

But that was the video of a different (although related) joke!

Frostbite · Post by **Frostbite** » Fri Nov 20, 2009 6:34 pm

Riiiight. It's all cleared up now. Good times can now be enjoyed by all.

mountainmage · Post by **mountainmage** » Fri Nov 20, 2009 8:42 pm

I'm not sure. I don't think I'm emotionally ready to have good times after such an experience.

Frostbite · Post by **Frostbite** » Sat Nov 21, 2009 12:17 am

Well, I guess you're a freedom hatin' commie then.

mountainmage · Post by **mountainmage** » Sat Nov 21, 2009 12:19 am

Like all members of the oldest profession, I'm a capitalist!

AHMETxRock · Post by **AHMETxRock** » Sat Nov 21, 2009 12:38 am

I actually support not letting the state try to define marriage. It's under the dominion of each person's religion. Everything else is just common law paperwork.

Frostbite · Post by **Frostbite** » Sat Nov 21, 2009 12:38 am

What about those without a religion?

mountainmage · Post by **mountainmage** » Sat Nov 21, 2009 12:41 am

AHMETxRock wrote:I actually support not letting the state try to define marriage. It's under the dominion of each person's religion. Everything else is just common law paperwork.

If the state doesn't define marriage, assholes will try to prevent people who should be legally eligible from getting married. Oh wait, that's already going on.

AHMETxRock · Post by **AHMETxRock** » Sat Nov 21, 2009 12:42 am

Athiest feminists would argue that not having marriage would be great, as the whole concept of marriage is to assert control over women while allowing the passing of property and wealth through the male's lines to be streamlined. Also, if she marries you and stays in that damn kitchen the whole of her life, you know that kid is yours.

mountainmage · Post by **mountainmage** » Sat Nov 21, 2009 12:43 am

Yup, that's a classic ahmetism alright.

AHMETxRock · Post by **AHMETxRock** » Sat Nov 21, 2009 1:02 am

AHMETxRock Classic.png

mountainmage · Post by **mountainmage** » Sat Nov 21, 2009 2:04 am

Make "Classic" in italics. That'll improve it slightly.

LordRetard · Post by **LordRetard** » Sat Nov 21, 2009 3:59 am

AHMETxRock wrote:Athiest feminists would argue that not having marriage would be great, as the whole concept of marriage is to assert control over women while allowing the passing of property and wealth through the male's lines to be streamlined. Also, if she marries you and stays in that damn kitchen the whole of her life, you know that kid is yours.

Oh god what!!

mountainmage · Post by **mountainmage** » Sat Nov 21, 2009 4:05 am

I pretty much had the same reaction. I was going to argue, but I just chalked it up as another classic ahmetism.

SMBC Comics Forum

Gays have literally destroyed the institution of marriage.

Re: Gays have literally destroyed the institution of marriage.

Re: Gays have literally destroyed the institution of marriage.

Re: Gays have literally destroyed the institution of marriage.

Re: Gays have literally destroyed the institution of marriage.

Re: Gays have literally destroyed the institution of marriage.

Re: Gays have literally destroyed the institution of marriage.

Re: Gays have literally destroyed the institution of marriage.

Re: Gays have literally destroyed the institution of marriage.

Re: Gays have literally destroyed the institution of marriage.

Re: Gays have literally destroyed the institution of marriage.

Re: Gays have literally destroyed the institution of marriage.

Re: Gays have literally destroyed the institution of marriage.

Re: Gays have literally destroyed the institution of marriage.

Re: Gays have literally destroyed the institution of marriage.

Re: Gays have literally destroyed the institution of marriage.