Gays have literally destroyed the institution of marriage.

Some of the News, every Once in a While

Moderator: GreenCrayon

Post Reply
User avatar
Oldrac the Chitinous
Chicken O' the Sea
Posts: 3477
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 11:41 pm
Location: The Perfect Stillness of the Deep
Contact:

Re: Gays have literally destroyed the institution of marriage.

Post by Oldrac the Chitinous »

I dunno, I thought it was a legitimate point.
Followed by gratuitous sexism.

So, I guess that makes it a classic Ahmetism, after all.
Police said they spent some time working out if they could charge the man with being armed with a weapon, as technically he was armed with part of a fish.

User avatar
LordRetard
The Most Retardedest
Posts: 9973
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 8:44 pm
Location: My Parents' Basement

Re: Gays have literally destroyed the institution of marriage.

Post by LordRetard »

Exactly, it's got all three elements of an Ahmetism; an argument, something offensive, and something totally unconnected.

User avatar
Apocalyptus
Not what you were expecting
Posts: 5283
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 2:00 pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: Gays have literally destroyed the institution of marriage.

Post by Apocalyptus »

AHMETxRock wrote:
AHMETxRock Classic.png
Ahmet-chu, I CHOOSE YOU!
Kimra wrote:Next they'll be denying us the right to say "We'll rape your arse if you don't come to this fucken country."

User avatar
mountainmage
Mage of the Mountains
Posts: 9601
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 11:42 am
Location: Right here. Right now.

Re: Gays have literally destroyed the institution of marriage.

Post by mountainmage »

Ugh, don't encourage him. :P
No more white horses ♬ ♫ ♪ ılıll|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|̲̅̅=̲̅̅|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|llılı ♪ ♫ ♬ for you to ride away

User avatar
Asherian
Token Erisian
Posts: 1272
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 6:22 am
Location: A City in the rain

Re: Gays have literally destroyed the institution of marriage.

Post by Asherian »

I'm just so glad to see we've categorized Ahmet to the point of a verb. That's just fantastic!

As far as the rape thing goes it is beyond creepy just how many woman are into that shit. Especially when you consider the ones who don't tell you, let you, then report you to the cops the next morning to make it feel real.

I'm against marriage defined by the state, but really thats just cause I find the source of marriage laws on a state and federal level highly offensive. (Yes, there are federal marriage laws already in place, from the late 1800s, I find it odd those didn't come up in the big debates a'tall.) Marriage is religious, civil contracts state, wee look! Separate!

Also is it really that offensive to be pro-choice and pro-death penalty, or just to have them connected in that way? If so should we include you being pro-meat just to add some soylent green to the picture?

if we stop encouraging him, then he might start making sense again. I'm not sure I can handle that, it was confusing as all sin.
As pure as the driven snow. Bitches

User avatar
mountainmage
Mage of the Mountains
Posts: 9601
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 11:42 am
Location: Right here. Right now.

Re: Gays have literally destroyed the institution of marriage.

Post by mountainmage »

It's not offensive to be pro-those things, but when someone makes it look like you're a fan of death it looks bad, even though it isn't.
No more white horses ♬ ♫ ♪ ılıll|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|̲̅̅=̲̅̅|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|llılı ♪ ♫ ♬ for you to ride away

User avatar
Asherian
Token Erisian
Posts: 1272
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 6:22 am
Location: A City in the rain

Re: Gays have literally destroyed the institution of marriage.

Post by Asherian »

I normally sum it up as 'pro-death' though, I never saw the issue with it.
I support assisted suicides in cases of long term no-cure diseases too, I see forcing them to live past when they wish to for pain, or other reasons, cruel and unusual. Again all part of the pro-death platform.
As pure as the driven snow. Bitches

User avatar
mountainmage
Mage of the Mountains
Posts: 9601
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 11:42 am
Location: Right here. Right now.

Re: Gays have literally destroyed the institution of marriage.

Post by mountainmage »

Damn, I support that too. I'm a grim reaper! :(
No more white horses ♬ ♫ ♪ ılıll|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|̲̅̅=̲̅̅|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|llılı ♪ ♫ ♬ for you to ride away

User avatar
Asherian
Token Erisian
Posts: 1272
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 6:22 am
Location: A City in the rain

Re: Gays have literally destroyed the institution of marriage.

Post by Asherian »

Now your problem seems to be you see death as a bad thing. Those who die don't mourn, only us left behind. (I feel this applies whether you believe in the soul and its release into heaven/reincarnation, or believe only oblivion and rot of the corpse is the following of death.
As pure as the driven snow. Bitches

User avatar
Cirtur
Licensed Troll Pornographer
Posts: 9964
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 8:13 pm
Location: Europe
Contact:

Re: Gays have literally destroyed the institution of marriage.

Post by Cirtur »

I only cry when I orgasm. And I do a lot of crying at funerals.

User avatar
Asherian
Token Erisian
Posts: 1272
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 6:22 am
Location: A City in the rain

Re: Gays have literally destroyed the institution of marriage.

Post by Asherian »

Cirtur wrote:I only cry when I orgasm. And I do a lot of crying at funerals.
See, this is why I love you Cirtur, you don't let propriety stop you in the slightest
As pure as the driven snow. Bitches

User avatar
Cirtur
Licensed Troll Pornographer
Posts: 9964
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 8:13 pm
Location: Europe
Contact:

Re: Gays have literally destroyed the institution of marriage.

Post by Cirtur »

It's not like I knew the deceased. very well.


I just lost touch with my brother

User avatar
LordRetard
The Most Retardedest
Posts: 9973
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 8:44 pm
Location: My Parents' Basement

Re: Gays have literally destroyed the institution of marriage.

Post by LordRetard »

I really just am pro-death. I'm not even really that interested in death penalty or youth-in-Asia or abortion discussions anymore. Actually, I am pro-abortion (not pro-choice) but I don't have much of an opinion on the other two. I guess they're better economically.

User avatar
Sahan
"I promise you no penis jokes."
Posts: 4360
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 6:20 am
Location: Perth, Australia
Contact:

Re: Gays have literally destroyed the institution of marriage.

Post by Sahan »

I support euthanasia, as long as proper procedures are put into place to stop people deciding to use it for purely economic reasons (killing the patient off to avoid expensive treatment and using up hospital resources when treatment is available). At the moment, it seems difficult to enable to ensure that sort of thing won't happen, so I hold against it until such a solution can be conceived.

Death penalty I understand again for economic purposes, but it seems the death penalty really appeals to our desire for vengeance more than anything else. If we could throw these criminals into a giant bottomless pit for all eternity instead, that would be the preferrable option for me. Since it's not, I still support life sentences instead as there are too many cases where police have framed innocent people in an attempt to get the case over with, particularly in America, and with a life sentence police can face legislation if they try that sort of stunt and fail.
Destructicus wrote: Alt text:
"I wonder if chemists feel bad that they're always left out of these sorts of jokes."

Since when is chemistry not a science?

User avatar
Euclidthegreek
Fisty McGee
Posts: 1868
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 7:06 pm
Location: The Mathiverse

Re: Gays have literally destroyed the institution of marriage.

Post by Euclidthegreek »

AHMETxRock wrote:I actually support not letting the state try to define marriage. It's under the dominion of each person's religion. Everything else is just common law paperwork.
I agree with Ahmet.
Sahan wrote:Death penalty I understand again for economic purposes, but it seems the death penalty really appeals to our desire for vengeance more than anything else. If we could throw these criminals into a giant bottomless pit for all eternity instead, that would be the preferrable option for me. Since it's not, I still support life sentences instead as there are too many cases where police have framed innocent people in an attempt to get the case over with, particularly in America, and with a life sentence police can face legislation if they try that sort of stunt and fail.
Wouldn't the giant bottomless pit also be appealing to our desire for vengeance? The thing about the death penalty is it's actually lest economical than life imprisonment.
LordRetard wrote:I really just am pro-death. I'm not even really that interested in death penalty or youth-in-Asia or abortion discussions anymore. Actually, I am pro-abortion (not pro-choice) but I don't have much of an opinion on the other two. I guess they're better economically.
Please be elaboratin'.
Edminster wrote:I'm starting to think Euclid lives in the past.

Post Reply