Page 4 of 8
Posted: Sun May 27, 2007 10:54 pm
by Dodger
elite me plz
Posted: Sun May 27, 2007 10:55 pm
by ziggy
Kay
Posted: Sun May 27, 2007 11:01 pm
by Dodger
Fucking liar, in fact I don't think your rawb at all.
Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 3:56 pm
by ziggy
No really, look, you're leeted now. Promise.
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 2:08 pm
by ruotwocone
oh my sweet jesus... it's like a 14 year old girl just exploded on my screen. (just a heads up to the new flock of noobs here, most of the forumites enjoy spelling and a loose sense of grammar. Basically what i'm saying is that your stock here will likely rise faster if you write in complete sentences.)
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 7:57 pm
by epoch
ruotwocone wrote:oh my sweet jesus... it's like a 14 year old girl just exploded on my screen.
even I wasn't this bad.
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 8:06 pm
by Mac
Don't judge me like you judge them.
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 8:38 pm
by ruotwocone
Mac wrote:Don't judge me like you judge them.
fair enough. i will instead judge you while not wearing pants. entirely unlike i judge the others... probably
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 4:42 am
by Lethal Interjection
ruotwocone wrote:Mac wrote:Don't judge me like you judge them.
fair enough. i will instead
picture you not wearing pants. entirely unlike i
picture the others... probably
I fixed that.
Also, I'm not surprised about the level of web conversation the average Cyanide and Happiness reader is able to portray. Because I've met a few others and... well... they aren't exactly the most mature. Personally I like some of C&H because it is subversive and pokes a lot of fun at political correctness, censorship and society in general. That said, I don't find all of their stuff all that funny, and some of it actually goes to far. I think Zach writes much better than them (illustrates better too, but it C&H probably doesn't have to do much drawing anymore as it is now essentially a sprite comic) and is generally funnier and more subtely subversive (what Zach says he'll get hate mail for, C&H writes often once a week), which takes something more. Wow, that tyrade ended up far longer than I expected.
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 3:20 pm
by ziggy
I would put more thought into my posts if I felt there was a reason to. However my interest has yet to be sparked.
Prove me wrong.
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 5:31 pm
by Lethal Interjection
ziggy wrote:I would put more thought into my posts if I felt there was a reason to. However my interest has yet to be sparked.
Prove me wrong.
Yet you post anyways, without having anything at all to say?
The Internet: A sounding board for a middle child generation who has nothing to say, but, dammit, they want to be heard anyways, one way or the other.
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 5:59 pm
by epoch
ziggy wrote:I would put more thought into my posts if I felt there was a reason to. However my interest has yet to be sparked.
Prove me wrong.
why should we prove anything to you?
what amazing accomplishments in ARGUING ON THE INTERNETS++ have you made?
seriously, we are just fine without you, and aside from these first annoying posts, we'll probably be able to ignore you.
just remember one thing.
this is a small board, with many mods. do the math.
Lethal Interjection wrote:
Yet you post anyways, without having anything at all to say?
The Internet: A sounding board for a middle child generation who has nothing to say, but, dammit, they want to be heard anyways, one way or the other.
also, I couldn't have said it better myself, thank you lethal.
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 6:00 pm
by TwoBuy
ziggy wrote:I would put more thought into my posts if I felt there was a reason to. However my interest has yet to be sparked.
Prove me wrong.
I am on this forum. QED
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 6:05 pm
by epoch
TwoBuy wrote:ziggy wrote:I would put more thought into my posts if I felt there was a reason to. However my interest has yet to be sparked.
Prove me wrong.
I am on this forum. don't be me.
fixed.*
comic on the way, inking now.
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 3:42 am
by mountainmage
these new members are sass-ay