Thomas Aquinas v. Untrustable
- Edminster
- Tested positive for Space-AIDS
- Posts: 8832
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 9:53 pm
- Location: Internet
- Contact:
Thomas Aquinas v. Untrustable
Thomas Aquinas:
Untrustable (Mod Battle):
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
ol qwerty bastard wrote:bitcoin is backed by math, and math is intrinsically perfect and logically consistent always
gödel stop spreading fud
- Asherian
- Token Erisian
- Posts: 1272
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 6:22 am
- Location: A City in the rain
Re: Thomas Aquinas v. Untrustable
Woot! Go Tomas! (I'm so voting for the one that looks like it took the most time)
As pure as the driven snow. Bitches
- wolf
- She-Barbarian of the North
- Posts: 650
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 4:36 pm
- Location: Canadia
Re: Thomas Aquinas v. Untrustable
Vote: Thomas Aquinas. the ham sandwich looks stale.
Can you hold my hand? It's a big poop
- AHMETxRock
- Spam-Bot Trollop
- Posts: 5515
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 1:54 am
- Location: Box of Cereal.
- Contact:
Re: Thomas Aquinas v. Untrustable
Tace bell or pork products? You fricken kidding me?
I vote for the one with the taco.
I vote for the one with the taco.
Just like an std, will never fully go away.
- Neglected Shoe
- Oceanolobiolographer? I hardly know her!
- Posts: 231
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 4:49 pm
- Contact:
Re: Thomas Aquinas v. Untrustable
I vote Thomas, as he made me chuckle and become slightly aroused.
"Someone didn't pay attention in religion class."
- Phoenix
- Easily burned, but always comes back for more
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 5:12 am
- Location: Texas!
Re: Thomas Aquinas v. Untrustable
How could I vote for someone who's name CLEARLY STATES that by nature he is untrustable?? Thomas, you've got my vote, good sir!
Lol, also thomas' was good.
Lol, also thomas' was good.
- mountainmage
- Mage of the Mountains
- Posts: 9595
- Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 11:42 am
- Location: Right here. Right now.
Re: Thomas Aquinas v. Untrustable
I vote Thomas, not because I understand his comic, but because Ham Sandwiches are not a meme.
No more white horses ♬ ♫ ♪ ılıll|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|̲̅̅=̲̅̅|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|llılı ♪ ♫ ♬ for you to ride away
- Snarky00
- /shrug
- Posts: 835
- Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 6:20 am
- Location: Seattle
- Contact:
Re: Thomas Aquinas v. Untrustable
Thomas to the max
- mypoorbrain
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 12:25 am
- Location: Canadia
Re: Thomas Aquinas v. Untrustable
Thomas.
Because what I take to be Untrustable in the pic looks like he's staring at me in awe. And it's always nice to be appreciated.
Because what I take to be Untrustable in the pic looks like he's staring at me in awe. And it's always nice to be appreciated.
- Kimra
- He-Man in a Miniskirt
- Posts: 6850
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:18 am
- Location: meanwhile elsewhere
- Sevans
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:37 pm
- Location: Vancouver, Canadia eh?
Re: Thomas Aquinas v. Untrustable
Thomas Aquinas
I'm setting my clock for EDT until this forum-battle is over.
Avatar from: http://www.flickr.com/photos/eworm/3401596917/
Avatar from: http://www.flickr.com/photos/eworm/3401596917/
- Cirtur
- Licensed Troll Pornographer
- Posts: 9960
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 8:13 pm
- Location: Europe
- Contact:
Re: Thomas Aquinas v. Untrustable
I vote for Untrustable, because I like ham sandwiches.
- Sahan
- "I promise you no penis jokes."
- Posts: 4361
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 6:20 am
- Location: Perth, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Thomas Aquinas v. Untrustable
I'm quite partial to ham sandwiches, but I still vote Tom for the effort.
Destructicus wrote: Alt text:
"I wonder if chemists feel bad that they're always left out of these sorts of jokes."
Since when is chemistry not a science?
- Avalant
- Ahmet's sex life
- Posts: 247
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:43 pm
- Location: Boston, MA
- Contact:
- Khazd
- Triscuit Ninja
- Posts: 646
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:54 pm
- Location: Somewhere in Canadia