Page 1 of 5

Star Trek (now with spoilers)

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 7:12 pm
by Jesster
This is a film, it's coming out in May. I saw a special preview of it while I wa sin Boston and holy crap it was so excellent that everyone in the audience applauded at the end. So you all need to spend your meagre amounts of money to see this film, possibly twice.

Re: Star Trek

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 7:55 pm
by FengharTheNord
I want to see it so so so bad. Thank you 100 million times thank you for confirming its goodness, because I also wanted to see xmen orgins really bad but then I saw the leaked version and was like NUUUUUUUUUUUUU.

Is Sylar the perfect young Spock like I imagine he is?

Re: Star Trek

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 8:33 pm
by LordRetard
What the fuck, no Shatner or Nimoy?

Gonna be shit. Gonna see it anyway.

Re: Star Trek

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 9:29 pm
by Jesster
Zachary Quinto is absolutely fantastic as Spock. I'm not the biggest Trekhead in the world, but the people I saw it with are. So if they're satisfied, then he must have been doing something right.

Re: Star Trek

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 9:36 pm
by LordRetard
I may as well see for myself, because it's not as if my schedule is packed this summer, but I will be distrustful of it and looking to not enjoy the movie.

Re: Star Trek

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 9:41 pm
by Jesster
LordRetard wrote:What the fuck, no Shatner or Nimoy?
Errrm, Nimoy is listed in the imdb cast list.

Re: Star Trek

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 9:49 pm
by LordRetard
Oh I see, Nimoy plays "Spock from the future"... I have a good feeling about this. Still, First Contact had weirdo time travel, and that was really good.

Re: Star Trek

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 9:50 pm
by Jesster
I am officially not allowed to say anything about the film that isn't already on imdb. But what they do works really, really well.

Re: Star Trek

Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 1:31 am
by mountainmage
I'd like to see it, but I need my meager sum of money for other things.

Re: Star Trek

Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 3:33 am
by Lethal Interjection
Good to know.
My roomate wants to see it quite badly, so it is good to know that if I want to tag along, my money will be well-spent.

Re: Star Trek

Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 3:04 pm
by Frostbite
I heard it was actually an incredibly quality film. I saw an article on The Onion that, the title was, "Star Trek fans decry new movie: "Fun" "Enjoyable" "

Re: Star Trek

Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 7:43 pm
by mountainmage
Isn't the Onion known for making funny stuff up?

Re: Star Trek

Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 8:17 pm
by Lethal Interjection
mountainmage wrote:Isn't the Onion known for making funny stuff up?
Actually, the idea of that article is probably one of the more brilliant ones I've heard from them.
The fact is that, from what I've read, it is the truth. But the history of such films tends to result in the opposite.
It is almost like double parody.

Re: Star Trek

Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 8:19 pm
by mountainmage
A Parody wrapped in a parody, deep-fried with onions? Delicious and hilarious!

Re: Star Trek

Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 9:14 pm
by FengharTheNord
And greasy.