[2011-Jun-13] Limit as x approaches infinity equals ethics.

Blame Quintushalls for this.

Moderators: NeatNit, Kimra

User avatar
ChaoticBrain
[ASK] me about supple pony flanks
Posts: 230
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:26 am
Location: 404 - Sanity Not Found

[2011-Jun-13] Limit as x approaches infinity equals ethics.

Post by ChaoticBrain »

http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&id=2275

Too bad making the war bigger tends to increase both K and X directly proportionally, otherwise this proof might only be 99% insane.

PhiloxSophia

Re: [June-13-2011] Limit as x approaches infinity equals eth

Post by PhiloxSophia »

This makes no sense... 99 people can't kill 1 person. Eventually, one person will be the actual "killer", even if 99 people stab a single person simultaneously there will be one knife which actually struck the "killing" blow (even if we're incapable of ever determining which knife). So in any killing scenario, 50% of the people involved will be victims...

User avatar
DonRetrasado
los más retrasadadados
Posts: 2845
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 6:27 am
Location: ¡Canadia!

Re: [June-13-2011] Limit as x approaches infinity equals eth

Post by DonRetrasado »

PhiloxSophia wrote:This makes no sense... 99 people can't kill 1 person. Eventually, one person will be the actual "killer", even if 99 people stab a single person simultaneously there will be one knife which actually struck the "killing" blow (even if we're incapable of ever determining which knife). So in any killing scenario, 50% of the people involved will be victims...
I don't think the person is going to survive if the "killing blow" didn't strike.
Astrogirl wrote:Lethal, nobody wants to know about your herpes.
Lethal Interjection wrote:That's good to know. I can avoid a few awkward phone calls now.

Shub

Re: [June-13-2011] Limit as x approaches infinity equals eth

Post by Shub »

The statement "for sufficiently large x, murder is a victimless crime" is inaccurate. That's not how limits work! This bothered me enough to make a forum post about it.

User avatar
Loraxxe
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 2:24 pm

Re: [June-13-2011] Limit as x approaches infinity equals eth

Post by Loraxxe »

DonRetrasado wrote:
PhiloxSophia wrote:This makes no sense... 99 people can't kill 1 person. Eventually, one person will be the actual "killer", even if 99 people stab a single person simultaneously there will be one knife which actually struck the "killing" blow (even if we're incapable of ever determining which knife). So in any killing scenario, 50% of the people involved will be victims...
I don't think the person is going to survive if the "killing blow" didn't strike.
Exactly. The death is overdetermined. You could even have 99 blows that would each be fatal individually.
Shub wrote:The statement "for sufficiently large x, murder is a victimless crime" is inaccurate. That's not how limits work! This bothered me enough to make a forum post about it.
Zach is trolling you. You haven't noticed the previous hundred times that he tends to do this to the overly anal?

Jonfon
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:27 am

Re: [June-13-2011] Limit as x approaches infinity equals eth

Post by Jonfon »

'For sufficiently large X, murder is a victimless crime' is false, but,

'The bigger we make a war, the more ethical it becomes' is true provided that the increase of people involved is of the set declaring the war, ethical defined as 'being in accordance with the rules or standards for right conduct or practice'. An increase of people agreeing to the war is an increase of people that admit to the war being in accordance to standards for right conduct or practice.

User avatar
Edminster
Tested positive for Space-AIDS
Posts: 8835
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 9:53 pm
Location: Internet
Contact:

Re: [June-13-2011] Limit as x approaches infinity equals eth

Post by Edminster »

Jonfon wrote:'For sufficiently large X, murder is a victimless crime' is false, but,

'The bigger we make a war, the more ethical it becomes' is true provided that the increase of people involved is of the set declaring the war, ethical defined as 'being in accordance with the rules or standards for right conduct or practice'. An increase of people agreeing to the war is an increase of people that admit to the war being in accordance to standards for right conduct or practice.
this assumes that "right" == majority opinion
ol qwerty bastard wrote:bitcoin is backed by math, and math is intrinsically perfect and logically consistent always

gödel stop spreading fud

Jonfon
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:27 am

Re: [June-13-2011] Limit as x approaches infinity equals eth

Post by Jonfon »

Edminster wrote:
Jonfon wrote:'For sufficiently large X, murder is a victimless crime' is false, but,

'The bigger we make a war, the more ethical it becomes' is true provided that the increase of people involved is of the set declaring the war, ethical defined as 'being in accordance with the rules or standards for right conduct or practice'. An increase of people agreeing to the war is an increase of people that admit to the war being in accordance to standards for right conduct or practice.
this assumes that "right" == majority opinion
No, this assumes plural compliance to rules or standards for right conduct or practice regarding that event. For each person agreeing to the war in place, one stance of accordance to the standard of war being right conduct or practice. 100,000 people actively taking part in the war, 100,000 accordances to rules or standards for right conduct or practice. 100,000 > 90,000 > 1, thus the more rightfully agreed the more ethical (ethical as defined). This doesn't assume what's right is defined by majority, this assumes what's right is defined by each moral agent (there are as many views on what is right as there are moral agents).

User avatar
Lethal Interjection
Death by Elocution
Posts: 8051
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 2:17 pm
Location: Behind your ear. It's magic!
Contact:

Re: [June-13-2011] Limit as x approaches infinity equals eth

Post by Lethal Interjection »

This comic wasn't funny. It was sad.

Anonymouse

Re: [June-13-2011] Limit as x approaches infinity equals eth

Post by Anonymouse »

Did somebody forget to make a jokey-wokey?

rwwright
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 4:33 am

Re: [June-13-2011] Limit as x approaches infinity equals eth

Post by rwwright »

Funny -- this kind of reasoning is used by people of all political persuasions to justify theft (i.e. taxes) all the time.

User avatar
Oldrac the Chitinous
Chicken O' the Sea
Posts: 3477
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 11:41 pm
Location: The Perfect Stillness of the Deep
Contact:

Re: [June-13-2011] Limit as x approaches infinity equals eth

Post by Oldrac the Chitinous »

rwwright wrote:Funny -- this kind of reasoning is used by people of all political persuasions to justify theft (i.e. taxes) all the time.
This is not the right place for this discussion.

The right place for this discussion is Tajikistan, because I am unlikely to be anywhere near there in the forseeable future.
Police said they spent some time working out if they could charge the man with being armed with a weapon, as technically he was armed with part of a fish.

User avatar
ChaoticBrain
[ASK] me about supple pony flanks
Posts: 230
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:26 am
Location: 404 - Sanity Not Found

Re: [June-13-2011] Limit as x approaches infinity equals eth

Post by ChaoticBrain »

Jonfon wrote:this assumes that "right" == majority opinion
Except we're talking about ethicality, not morality. Morals are all about determining which behaviors are good or bad. Ethics are all about determining which behaviors are socially acceptable or unacceptable.

In morals, your conscience lets you decide.
In ethics, that which benefits the majority rules over all.

Jonfon
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:27 am

Re: [June-13-2011] Limit as x approaches infinity equals eth

Post by Jonfon »

There is something to be noted, ethicality isn't always desired or desirable. E.g. if you live in a world where the majority of citizens and the government are explicitly pro Islam, but you are Jew, the ethical thing to do is no doubt to convert to Islam. We'd be hard-pressed to find that right however ethical.

Eneasz

Re: [June-13-2011] Limit as x approaches infinity equals eth

Post by Eneasz »

Anyone saying "but 999 people can't kill someone" is thinking way to literally.

As to how we can get 999 people to kill someone, I think we actually do that already in several states. IMHO the death penalty is an example of at least 51% of the population deciding to kill a person (in practice only a few dozen make the final decision, but tacitly they have the approval of the majority of the voting populace). And current law agrees that this is not a crime, in fact it is obligatory in some cases, which would make this - in my opinion - a real-life example of X being big enough that killing was considered a victimless crime.

Post Reply