Page 3 of 3

Re: Ethical wars [2011-Jun-24]

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2011 5:38 pm
by Ploogle
Hey everyone! I loved this comic, and want to advertise something unrelated. But that would be something a tool would do, and I'm not a tool.

Re: Ethical wars [2011-Jun-24]

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2011 7:33 pm
by Astrogirl
Edminster wrote:
Chiatroll wrote:(also I feel when the question is "What is the first name of Zach's wife?", then, "Jesus! Why the hell should I know. What am I, Zack's motherfucking stalker?" is a valid answer.)
Eisbreaker wrote:My original response was indeed something along the lines of "How the bloody fuck should I know?".
Still, it's a pretty good counter-spam measure because spambots can't use Google. I dread the day they will.
Everybody point at these people and laugh at them for not reading the FAQ.
There's a FAQ? And it mentions Zach's wife's name? Where?

Re: Ethical wars [2011-Jun-24]

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2011 8:00 pm
by Edminster
Edminster wrote:
Chiatroll wrote:(also I feel when the question is "What is the first name of Zach's wife?", then, "Jesus! Why the hell should I know. What am I, Zack's motherfucking stalker?" is a valid answer.)
Eisbreaker wrote:My original response was indeed something along the lines of "How the bloody fuck should I know?".
Still, it's a pretty good counter-spam measure because spambots can't use Google. I dread the day they will.
Astrogirl wrote:There's a FAQ? And it mentions Zach's wife's name? Where?
Everybody point at these people and laugh at them for not reading the FAQ.
Although I'm starting to think the level of lateral thinking required to connect the dots may be a bit much to ask of Zach's general audience : (

Re: Ethical wars [2011-Jun-24]

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2011 11:27 pm
by Guest
Chiatroll wrote:Shouldn't panel five be say designers not definers?
Panel three says they are the definers of "smart", "fit" and "ethical".

Re: Ethical wars [2011-Jun-24]

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:45 am
by wooted
Why wouldn't they just create a daily or weekly cap to the amount of points you can earn

Re: Ethical wars [2011-Jun-24]

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 7:20 am
by Astrogirl
Because then:
Monday - Thursday: Everybody tries to beat each other to help that old lady cross the street.
Friday - Sunday: Max ethics points reached - let's push the lady when the bus is coming.

Re: Ethical wars [2011-Jun-24]

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 7:37 am
by DonRetrasado
I think that creates negative points. You couldn't intentionally push her unless you could make a case that she was definitely in your way.

Re: Ethical wars [2011-Jun-24]

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 7:52 am
by Astrogirl
Easy: Old people are *always* in the way.

Re: Ethical wars [2011-Jun-24]

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 8:13 am
by DonRetrasado
Well that increases my score for the whole week!

Re: Ethical wars [2011-Jun-24]

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:52 pm
by Lethal Interjection
I swear, I cut through that retirement village's park because it was a shortcut!

Re: Ethical wars [2011-Jun-24]

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2011 5:16 am
by Kimra
This reminds me of Death Race 2000. Except you got more points for killing the young and healthy, because they were harder to catch. Why don't we have blood sports anymore? Not with animals, that would be cruel. But people? I'm all for people!

Re: Ethical wars [2011-Jun-24]

Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 1:52 am
by Quintushalls
Given the upcoming space comedy series being released by SMBC Theater, do you think they will take this kind of Sci-Fi concepts like in this comic and apply it to the series (like with Red Dwarf)? I think that would be awesome if they gave it more thought beyond the simple "comedy that just so happens to take place in space based on Star Wars" routine already done by College Humor.