[2011-Aug-17] Parroting

Blame Quintushalls for this.

Moderators: NeatNit, Kimra

User avatar
Edminster
Tested positive for Space-AIDS
Posts: 8832
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 9:53 pm
Location: Internet
Contact:

[2011-Aug-17] Parroting

Post by Edminster »

http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&id=2340

I... I laughed at an SMBC comic.

Image

all those years of hatred have been wasted

gone

down the drain

forever gone












until the next comic is posted and it is again a lengthy diatribe about how nerds are superior to the duckspeaking proles
ol qwerty bastard wrote:bitcoin is backed by math, and math is intrinsically perfect and logically consistent always

gödel stop spreading fud

User avatar
DonRetrasado
los más retrasadadados
Posts: 2845
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 6:27 am
Location: ¡Canadia!

Re: Parroting [17 Aug 2011]

Post by DonRetrasado »

See, I didn't laugh. You built it up too much and I was scorin' for disappointment.
Astrogirl wrote:Lethal, nobody wants to know about your herpes.
Lethal Interjection wrote:That's good to know. I can avoid a few awkward phone calls now.

User avatar
Kimra
He-Man in a Miniskirt
Posts: 6850
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:18 am
Location: meanwhile elsewhere

Re: Parroting [17 Aug 2011]

Post by Kimra »

It's okay Ed, we still love you.
King Prawn

Quintushalls
Posts: 120
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 2:32 pm

Re: Parroting [17 Aug 2011]

Post by Quintushalls »

Via http://www.eparrots.biz/talk.html

This is very much possible. An African Grey parrot can hold 2000 words in its vocabulary.

User avatar
GUTCHUCKER
Gotchucker's less handsome twin
Posts: 2126
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 2:26 am
Location: Paradise City?

Re: Parroting [17 Aug 2011]

Post by GUTCHUCKER »

Zach is mocking philosophers. That does not make this viewpoint valid, nor does it reflect on our ability to think.
We can use our vocabulary outside of the immediate context and in the absence of a context. This is a fundamental difference.
Datanazush wrote:I ship Mohammed and Jehova.

Soliloquy

Re: Parroting [17 Aug 2011]

Post by Soliloquy »

Honestly, I can't think of any way this viewpoint could be considered valid, outside of Zach's obsession with the idea that there is no truth.
GUTCHUCKER wrote:Zach is mocking philosophers. That does not make this viewpoint valid, nor does it reflect on our ability to think.
We can use our vocabulary outside of the immediate context and in the absence of a context. This is a fundamental difference.
I dunno if that's what zach intended. Because in just about every other comic in which Zach says [group x] are no longer allowed [to perform action y], the group in question is making a legitimate point.

User avatar
Gangler
watashi wa kawaii desu ne ^o^;
Posts: 906
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 11:42 pm

Re: Parroting [17 Aug 2011]

Post by Gangler »

I thought it was taking a purely nurture stance. Parrot makes the sounds that get positively reinforced the same way some sociological schools of thought would paint us as being 100% programmed by our environment. One could also paint similarities between the notion of human intelligence as an evolutionary characteristic originally just meant to aid in survival but now given applications beyond that and the parrot's ability to speak being used in new ways within the domestic context. Either that or just a generic poke at the "Unintelligent masses" who just regurgitate the phrases and ideas that pop culture keeps throwing at them with the implication that just because they speak doesn't mean they think.

I really do find these types of discussions to be a little silly though. People will list off the ways fauna X is intelligent and resembles humans and this and that and come at me with the "How can you think their lives are any less sacred than a human's?"

I'm all like "Woah woah woah, when did I start talking about human life like that was sacred? Show me an orangutang that can hygienically make me an expresso and I'll start advocating their need for rights. You know, once we've got all the shit that's actually relevant to my country taken care of."

I sometimes wonder about those animal activists. There's something up with them.
Paranoid? Probably. But just because you're paranoid doesn't mean that there isn't an invisible demon
about to eat your face.

User avatar
ChaoticBrain
[ASK] me about supple pony flanks
Posts: 230
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:26 am
Location: 404 - Sanity Not Found

Re: Parroting [17 Aug 2011]

Post by ChaoticBrain »

What is it with parrots in fiction always starting and ending their phrases with a squawk? Real parrots don't do that, so where did this trope even come from, and why is it still so annoyingly popular?

User avatar
Gangler
watashi wa kawaii desu ne ^o^;
Posts: 906
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 11:42 pm

Re: Parroting [17 Aug 2011]

Post by Gangler »

It came from your mom. She's a successful cinematographer who's responsible for much of what has entered the public consciousness.
Paranoid? Probably. But just because you're paranoid doesn't mean that there isn't an invisible demon
about to eat your face.

User avatar
Oldrac the Chitinous
Chicken O' the Sea
Posts: 3476
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 11:41 pm
Location: The Perfect Stillness of the Deep
Contact:

Re: Parroting [17 Aug 2011]

Post by Oldrac the Chitinous »

Maybe the parrot thinks he's in boot camp, and squawking is parrot for "sir".
Police said they spent some time working out if they could charge the man with being armed with a weapon, as technically he was armed with part of a fish.

User avatar
Lethal Interjection
Death by Elocution
Posts: 8048
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 2:17 pm
Location: Behind your ear. It's magic!
Contact:

Re: Parroting [17 Aug 2011]

Post by Lethal Interjection »

ChaoticBrain wrote:What is it with parrots in fiction always starting and ending their phrases with a squawk? Real parrots don't do that, so where did this trope even come from, and why is it still so annoyingly popular?
I think it is probably the way they take the anthropomorphization out of the context. A bird that simply talks could be a cartoon. A bird that squaks first, valid or not, comes off as just a stupid real bird that knows a few words.
This could be incorrect, but it was my first thought.

User avatar
GUTCHUCKER
Gotchucker's less handsome twin
Posts: 2126
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 2:26 am
Location: Paradise City?

Re: Parroting [17 Aug 2011]

Post by GUTCHUCKER »

It's probably all of the points above, also he is actually reading the forum and he's fucking with us.
Datanazush wrote:I ship Mohammed and Jehova.

Quintushalls
Posts: 120
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 2:32 pm

Re: Parroting [17 Aug 2011]

Post by Quintushalls »

Every commenter here is a parrot except you! RAAHHHK!

Martin The Mess
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 11:40 pm

Re: Parroting [17 Aug 2011]

Post by Martin The Mess »

At my college, the Economics department had a pet parrot as a mascot. It was trained to reply to pretty much anything anyone said to it with "Awwk! Supply and Demand! Awwk!"

Given that "supply and demand" is pretty much your average Econ 101 prof's answer to any Econ-related question containing the word "why", I'm surprised the Parrot didn't have tenure.

danielgudman

Re: Parroting [17 Aug 2011]

Post by danielgudman »

So was that other parrot from the Creative Writing Program?

Post Reply