[2012-Jan-11] 2.77 or 3.14 on the Kinsey Scale

Blame Quintushalls for this.

Moderators: NeatNit, Kimra

Quintushalls
Posts: 120
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 2:32 pm

[2012-Jan-11] 2.77 or 3.14 on the Kinsey Scale

Post by Quintushalls »

http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db ... 2489#comic

No matter where I fall, if you have Euler's constant or Pi on the Kinsey Scale, I would like to fuck your brains out.

Speaking of the Kinsey Scale, here it is:

0 Exclusively heterosexual
1 Predominantly heterosexual, only incidentally homosexual
2 Predominantly heterosexual, but more than incidentally homosexual
3 Equally heterosexual and homosexual
4 Predominantly homosexual, but more than incidentally heterosexual
5 Predominantly homosexual, only incidentally heterosexual
6 Exclusively homosexual
X Non-sexual

Where do you land on the scale?

I guess I'm a 2.0 if I'm only attracted to women, but I'd have sex with Nathan Fillion if given the opportunity..and had chloroform.

User avatar
DonRetrasado
los más retrasadadados
Posts: 2845
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 6:27 am
Location: ¡Canadia!

Re: [2012-Jan-11] 2.77 or 3.14 on the Kinsey Scale

Post by DonRetrasado »

0 on the kinsey scale; rock-hard stud
Astrogirl wrote:Lethal, nobody wants to know about your herpes.
Lethal Interjection wrote:That's good to know. I can avoid a few awkward phone calls now.

User avatar
Pitch Hitter
[Insert Here]
Posts: 232
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2011 2:29 am

Re: [2012-Jan-11] 2.77 or 3.14 on the Kinsey Scale

Post by Pitch Hitter »

Quintushalls wrote:No matter where I fall, if you have Euler's constant or Pi on the Kinsey Scale, I would like to fuck your brains out.
Hey hey, look at this guy, how WACKY, he likes e and π. And firefly. Very obscure cultural touchstones. I don't think anyone except him and I GET it.

DonRetrasado wrote:0 on the kinsey scale; rock-hard stud
You might not be, have you heard of a two-dimensional sexuality graph?

Image

You could be at a 0,0 for all we know, instead of the 0,10 which we must assume you are boasting about.
Last edited by Pitch Hitter on Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:44 am, edited 1 time in total.

Quintushalls
Posts: 120
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 2:32 pm

Re: [2012-Jan-11] 2.77 or 3.14 on the Kinsey Scale

Post by Quintushalls »

DonRetrasado wrote:0 on the kinsey scale; rock-hard stud
Okay, what if a man had a full sex change and now looks exactly like Scarlett Johansson?
Pitch Hitter wrote:Hey hey, look at this guy, how WACKY, he likes e and π. And firefly. Very obscure cultural touchstones. I don't think anyone except him and I GET it.
I know, right We are total hipsters.

User avatar
DonRetrasado
los más retrasadadados
Posts: 2845
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 6:27 am
Location: ¡Canadia!

Re: [2012-Jan-11] 2.77 or 3.14 on the Kinsey Scale

Post by DonRetrasado »

Quintushalls wrote:Scarlett Johansson
not that attractive

Also, if a man has a full sex change, then he's a woman, so it still wouldn't be gay.
Astrogirl wrote:Lethal, nobody wants to know about your herpes.
Lethal Interjection wrote:That's good to know. I can avoid a few awkward phone calls now.

Quintushalls
Posts: 120
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 2:32 pm

Re: [2012-Jan-11] 2.77 or 3.14 on the Kinsey Scale

Post by Quintushalls »

DonRetrasado wrote:
Quintushalls wrote:Scarlett Johansson
not that attractive

Also, if a man has a full sex change, then he's a woman, so it still wouldn't be gay.
But you know she used to be a man! How about Christina Hendricks? Also, if you aren't attracted to Scarlett Johansson, then you might be a little gay.

User avatar
Sahan
"I promise you no penis jokes."
Posts: 4361
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 6:20 am
Location: Perth, Australia
Contact:

Re: [2012-Jan-11] 2.77 or 3.14 on the Kinsey Scale

Post by Sahan »

Or perhaps he doesn't find Scarlett Johnasonn to be very attractive. Beauty in the eye of the beholder and all that. Being straight does not imply you must find all women attractive, and being gay doesn't imply you're turned on by every guy you meet either.
Destructicus wrote: Alt text:
"I wonder if chemists feel bad that they're always left out of these sorts of jokes."

Since when is chemistry not a science?

Quintushalls
Posts: 120
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 2:32 pm

Re: [2012-Jan-11] 2.77 or 3.14 on the Kinsey Scale

Post by Quintushalls »

Sahan wrote:Or perhaps he doesn't find Scarlett Johnasonn to be very attractive. Beauty in the eye of the beholder and all that. Being straight does not imply you must find all women attractive, and being gay doesn't imply you're turned on by every guy you meet either.
On a poll representing all men, Scarlett was rated as #7 on the most beautiful women in the world. She had an overall score of 94, user score of 92.2, and a rating of 94.8.
http://www.askmen.com/specials/2011_top ... nsson.html

User avatar
Sahan
"I promise you no penis jokes."
Posts: 4361
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 6:20 am
Location: Perth, Australia
Contact:

Re: [2012-Jan-11] 2.77 or 3.14 on the Kinsey Scale

Post by Sahan »

I'm sorry to be a statistical outlier according to an article on a highly respected men's magazine. I have to live with the shame of it every day.
Destructicus wrote: Alt text:
"I wonder if chemists feel bad that they're always left out of these sorts of jokes."

Since when is chemistry not a science?

User avatar
Pitch Hitter
[Insert Here]
Posts: 232
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2011 2:29 am

Re: [2012-Jan-11] 2.77 or 3.14 on the Kinsey Scale

Post by Pitch Hitter »

Yeah sahan, she's 92.2% attractive!

Don't you understand math?!

User avatar
DonRetrasado
los más retrasadadados
Posts: 2845
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 6:27 am
Location: ¡Canadia!

Re: [2012-Jan-11] 2.77 or 3.14 on the Kinsey Scale

Post by DonRetrasado »

Quintushalls wrote:
Sahan wrote:Or perhaps he doesn't find Scarlett Johnasonn to be very attractive. Beauty in the eye of the beholder and all that. Being straight does not imply you must find all women attractive, and being gay doesn't imply you're turned on by every guy you meet either.
On a poll representing all men, Scarlett was rated as #7 on the most beautiful women in the world. She had an overall score of 94, user score of 92.2, and a rating of 94.8.
http://www.askmen.com/specials/2011_top ... nsson.html
Yeah, and at #2 Mila Kunis narrowly beats out Sofia Vergara, so, if you're okay with that assessment, I think you might be a little gay.
Astrogirl wrote:Lethal, nobody wants to know about your herpes.
Lethal Interjection wrote:That's good to know. I can avoid a few awkward phone calls now.

User avatar
Sahan
"I promise you no penis jokes."
Posts: 4361
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 6:20 am
Location: Perth, Australia
Contact:

Re: [2012-Jan-11] 2.77 or 3.14 on the Kinsey Scale

Post by Sahan »

It's true. As a heterosexual man I find that I enjoy the taste of tea over coffee, so I think it's fair to say that any men who don't feel that way are probably flamboyantly homosexual.
Destructicus wrote: Alt text:
"I wonder if chemists feel bad that they're always left out of these sorts of jokes."

Since when is chemistry not a science?

User avatar
Edminster
Tested positive for Space-AIDS
Posts: 8832
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 9:53 pm
Location: Internet
Contact:

Re: [2012-Jan-11] 2.77 or 3.14 on the Kinsey Scale

Post by Edminster »

Sahan wrote:It's true. As a heterosexual man I find that I enjoy the taste of tea over coffee, so I think it's fair to say that any men who don't feel that way are probably flamboyantly homosexual.
Well I love coffee and also am gay so you are 100% correct on this.
ol qwerty bastard wrote:bitcoin is backed by math, and math is intrinsically perfect and logically consistent always

gödel stop spreading fud

User avatar
Sahan
"I promise you no penis jokes."
Posts: 4361
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 6:20 am
Location: Perth, Australia
Contact:

Re: [2012-Jan-11] 2.77 or 3.14 on the Kinsey Scale

Post by Sahan »

Edminster wrote:
Sahan wrote:It's true. As a heterosexual man I find that I enjoy the taste of tea over coffee, so I think it's fair to say that any men who don't feel that way are probably flamboyantly homosexual.
Well I love coffee and also am gay so you are 100% correct on this.
Exactly. And I think you will find that 100% > 92.2%. The maths doesn't lie.
Destructicus wrote: Alt text:
"I wonder if chemists feel bad that they're always left out of these sorts of jokes."

Since when is chemistry not a science?

User avatar
Pitch Hitter
[Insert Here]
Posts: 232
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2011 2:29 am

Re: [2012-Jan-11] 2.77 or 3.14 on the Kinsey Scale

Post by Pitch Hitter »

I 100% get an erection when I listen to Dan Savage's sex podcast. He's gay but he talks about sex all the time and here's the thing: sex between men and women!



I know!

Post Reply