Page 5 of 5

Re: [2012 March 23] Erectus Nocturnus

Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2012 12:47 am
by ATGGAATAA
There would be no change in gravitational attraction due to increased wang volume, it only represents a relocation of blood rather than a gain of mass.

Re: [2012 March 23] Erectus Nocturnus

Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2012 1:50 am
by Lethal Interjection
ATGGAATAA wrote:There would be no change in gravitational attraction due to increased wang volume, it only represents a relocation of blood rather than a gain of mass.
Really?

Re: [2012 March 23] Erectus Nocturnus

Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2012 2:25 am
by Oldrac the Chitinous
Surely if that were the case, someone would have said something by now.

Re: [2012 March 23] Erectus Nocturnus

Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2012 7:29 am
by DonRetrasado
ATGGAATAA wrote:There would be no change in gravitational attraction due to increased wang volume, it only represents a relocation of blood rather than a gain of mass.
I haven't thought of this. Could you continue for a few pages?

Re: [2012 March 23] Erectus Nocturnus

Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 5:44 pm
by thejakeman
"Sir! The Sarcasmotron is fizzing and emitting sparks!"

Re: [2012 March 23] Erectus Nocturnus

Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 2:44 am
by Lethal Interjection
No, that's the Orgasmatron.

The Sarcasmatron isn't even plugged in.

Re: [2012 March 23] Erectus Nocturnus

Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 11:22 am
by Kaharz
Lethal Interjection wrote:The Sarcasmatron isn't even plugged in.
Well of course not. It is the only known example of an actual perpetual motion machine.

Re: [2012 March 23] Erectus Nocturnus

Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 5:38 am
by ckelly
ATGGAATAA wrote:There would be no change in gravitational attraction due to increased wang volume, it only represents a relocation of blood rather than a gain of mass.
Gravitational attraction depends on distance in addition to mass, so relocation has an effect, albeit completely inconsequential.