[2012-Apr-03] Paranoia

Blame Quintushalls for this.

Moderators: NeatNit, Kimra

Guest

Re: [2012-April-3] Paranoia

Post by Guest »

JJ wrote:Now, what will the computer do when Felix dies and happiness crashes? This doesn't seem like a sustainable plan.
"Is it ethical to-"
"No. You should spend all your time creating a longevity drug for Felix."

JJ

Re: [2012-April-3] Paranoia

Post by JJ »

Guest wrote:
JJ wrote:Now, what will the computer do when Felix dies and happiness crashes? This doesn't seem like a sustainable plan.
"Is it ethical to-"
"No. You should spend all your time creating a longevity drug for Felix."
And if they fail/it is found longevity is impossible in humans? Then over the long term the computer would have greatly failed in it's task.

dauntless

Re: [2012-April-3] Paranoia

Post by dauntless »

Sprinkles wrote:Happiness is of no value, it's just a chemical in your brain. Inject serotonin into everyone's head, job done.
Now that's a 14 panel comic I can get behind.

Guest

Re: [2012-April-3] Paranoia

Post by Guest »

If anyone plays Civilization, this comics strikes home

Dr Shenanigans

Re: [2012-April-3] Paranoia

Post by Dr Shenanigans »

So long as it can be proven, or hell assumed, that human happiness saturates at some given point, then Felix would have been ignored by the computer very quickly; and hell, most anything and everything in this universe saturates at one point or another. In the real world unstable systems do not zoom off to infity, they either saturate or explode, usually do to saturation. Wait, by my logic Felix should have exploded happiness and rained it down upon everyone. Maybe that is the secret end goal of the computer. But wait, what if all that happiness floods by like a tsunami, and everyone drowns in it. A mass extinction due to endorphins...

User avatar
ChaoticBrain
[ASK] me about supple pony flanks
Posts: 230
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:26 am
Location: 404 - Sanity Not Found

Re: [2012-April-3] Paranoia

Post by ChaoticBrain »

Zach, I just want you to know that, in response to the fifth panel, I am currently warming up the Orbital Friendship Cannon. I thought it would be sporting to give you a five-second heads-up.

User avatar
Spinalcold
Posts: 23
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 5:19 am

Re: [2012-April-3] Paranoia

Post by Spinalcold »

the computer could just discard the lowest denominator....or it could make billions of sexbots. I'm hoping for the later.

dauntless

Re: [2012-April-3] Paranoia

Post by dauntless »

Wouldn't there be faster gains in total happiness by slaughtering people who bring down the average individual happiness? After several rounds of killing off unhappy people, you could start killing off content people, then only slightly bemused people. SMBC Comics Forum dwellers would be the first to go...

--
unregistered

User avatar
Sahan
"I promise you no penis jokes."
Posts: 4361
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 6:20 am
Location: Perth, Australia
Contact:

Re: [2012-April-3] Paranoia

Post by Sahan »

I'm guessing at some stage there'll be enough people unhappy with the declarations of the computer, that maximum happiness will come from a decision to revolt and destroy the computer.
Destructicus wrote: Alt text:
"I wonder if chemists feel bad that they're always left out of these sorts of jokes."

Since when is chemistry not a science?

User avatar
Kimra
He-Man in a Miniskirt
Posts: 6850
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:18 am
Location: meanwhile elsewhere

Re: [2012-April-3] Paranoia

Post by Kimra »

dauntless wrote:Wouldn't there be faster gains in total happiness by slaughtering people who bring down the average individual happiness? After several rounds of killing off unhappy people, you could start killing off content people, then only slightly bemused people. SMBC Comics Forum dwellers would be the first to go...

--
unregistered
Wouldn't everyone be unhappy then? If you had to spend time worrying about if you were happy or not you'd become neurotic and unhappy.

Also, only the stupid would survive. Ignorance, as they say, is bliss.
King Prawn

User avatar
Kaharz
This Intentionally Left Blank
Posts: 1571
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 12:17 pm

Re: [2012-April-3] Paranoia

Post by Kaharz »

sotic wrote:
Sprinkles wrote:Happiness is of no value, it's just a chemical in your brain. Inject serotonin into everyone's head, job done.
Roger Williams did that in The Metamorphosis of Prime Intellect. A computer which obeys Asimov's laws of robotics essentially becomes a god, and then a ton of people just tell it to put electrodes in their brains and stimulate them constantly.
Asimov also explored this is some of his short stories. I can't remember the title, but one is based on a world controlling computer that has evolved to decide what will make everyone most happy. Every action is completely specified by the computer.

I don't know if Zach intended it or not, but it reads kind of like an allegory for unequal distribution of wealth in capitalist societies and 'Reaganomics."
Kaharz wrote:I don't need a title. I have no avatar or tagline either. I am unique in my lack of personal identifiers.

Destructicus
Posts: 33
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 9:50 am

Re: [2012-April-3] Paranoia

Post by Destructicus »

FYIGuy wrote:FYI: This problem can be solved by maximizing average happiness where average is actually an exponentially weighted average. Unhappier people get bigger weights.
Excellent idea. In addition you could make your decisions to maximize the (exponentially weighted) median happiness rather than the mean (which I assume is what "average" means in this context) one.

Jewlian
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 10:43 am

Re: [2012-April-3] Paranoia

Post by Jewlian »

No competent computer scientists will program the computer to maximize for average hapiness. What you would normally use is variance-adjusted happiness e,g Sharpe Happiness .
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharpe_ratio

Mama Luigi

Re: [2012-April-3] Paranoia

Post by Mama Luigi »

I just noticed, Felix's shirt looks a lot like Freakazoid's emblem.

Faraday's Cage

Re: [2012-April-3] Paranoia

Post by Faraday's Cage »

dauntless wrote:... you could start killing off content people, then only slightly bemused people...
Bemused does not mean what you think it means

-FC

Post Reply