[2012-May-08] Glottal Stops.

Blame Quintushalls for this.

Moderators: NeatNit, Kimra

Ncide

Re: [2012-May-08] Glottal Stops.

Post by Ncide »

im sorry smbc guy, but pretty much everything in this comic beyond panel 1 is wrong. pronouncing "mint condition" as "min' condition" doesnt cause a glottal stop. at all. a glottal stop uses the GLOTTIS. as in, the back of your throat. if you were using the back of your throat to truncate the "T" then in would sound like "ming condition".

glottal stops occur between two vowels. as in the cockney accent. never before a consonant.

I cant decide if this comic makes me more angry at you for getting it wrong, or embarrassed for you for spending so much time making a comic thats so blatantly wrong. its definitley a bit of both

Seabasser

Re: [2012-May-08] Glottal Stops.

Post by Seabasser »

Ncide wrote:im sorry smbc guy, but pretty much everything in this comic beyond panel 1 is wrong. pronouncing "mint condition" as "min' condition" doesnt cause a glottal stop. at all. a glottal stop uses the GLOTTIS. as in, the back of your throat. if you were using the back of your throat to truncate the "T" then in would sound like "ming condition".

glottal stops occur between two vowels. as in the cockney accent. never before a consonant.

I cant decide if this comic makes me more angry at you for getting it wrong, or embarrassed for you for spending so much time making a comic thats so blatantly wrong. its definitley a bit of both
Well, unreleased /t/ is at least glottalized in syllable final position, so he's close. It's not quite the same as a glottal stop, but can be perceived as one.

Better than it was this morning before he fixed it.

User avatar
DonRetrasado
los más retrasadadados
Posts: 2845
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 6:27 am
Location: ¡Canadia!

Re: [2012-May-08] Glottal Stops.

Post by DonRetrasado »

kevang wrote:
DonRetrasado wrote:The other problem is with the whole definition of "glottal stop". A glottal stop can't be performed with the tongue, or else it wouldn't be glottal (that is, produced in the glottis or vocal tract). You're also making a glottal stop pretty much all the damn time. Every language uses the glottal stop or else your glottis would just keep vibrating for-fucking-ever. That's being a bit pedantic (I really only said it 'cause I thought it was funny) but truthfully a glottal stop consonant is just whenever you stop your glottis, and you're using it as a consonant. Which is extremely common, you use one at the end of every sentence.
I think when people say glottal stop, they usually mean, more specifically, a glottal plosive, i.e. a stop with a burst of air after the occlusion.
Well yeah, like I said, it's a pretty pedantic explanation, and exaggerated for effect. Glottal stop usually refers to a glottal stop consonant (which would need be a plosive). I'm not liking what I said about "one at the end of every sentence", so I'll scratch that and say something else; you'd use a glottal plosive at the beginning of every utterance which begins with a vowel, simply as a mechanical issue, unless you were panting heavily or something, I don't know. It has been a while since I've done this, so maybe I'm making a mistake here, but in any case I'm not familiar with a spoken language that does not use a glottal stop in some capacity.

I'm not exactly keen on the terminology we use for glottal sounds; certainly, saying "glottal stop" or "glottal plosive" is convenient, but to me it doesn't really capture how different glottal stops are from other plosives, which require another place of articulation. Well, that's just me. I definitely don't like "glottal fricative".
Astrogirl wrote:Lethal, nobody wants to know about your herpes.
Lethal Interjection wrote:That's good to know. I can avoid a few awkward phone calls now.

User avatar
Lethal Interjection
Death by Elocution
Posts: 8051
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 2:17 pm
Location: Behind your ear. It's magic!
Contact:

Re: [2012-May-08] Glottal Stops.

Post by Lethal Interjection »

I'm glad to see that this is already this long. And that some linguists are around.
Because then all I have to say is the the comic is wrong and shit.

User avatar
Sandwiches
[Insert In Mouth]
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:01 am

Re: [2012-May-08] Glottal Stops.

Post by Sandwiches »

People really do seem to be forgetting that it's shit.

User avatar
DonRetrasado
los más retrasadadados
Posts: 2845
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 6:27 am
Location: ¡Canadia!

Re: [2012-May-08] Glottal Stops.

Post by DonRetrasado »

What's really bizarre, for me, is that linguists love shit like this. I've already seen a couple of facebook posts saying "yeah, the linguistics is wrong, but I LOVE this comic!" I think it's years of basically being ignored that cause us to get really excited whenever anyone remembers we exist. Most of the linguists I know actually really like SMBC. It's very mysterious.
Astrogirl wrote:Lethal, nobody wants to know about your herpes.
Lethal Interjection wrote:That's good to know. I can avoid a few awkward phone calls now.

User avatar
Sandwiches
[Insert In Mouth]
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:01 am

Re: [2012-May-08] Glottal Stops.

Post by Sandwiches »

It's like xkcd with maths, my high school maths teacher every wednesday we start the lesson with that day's xkcd.

Hilarious.

User avatar
DonRetrasado
los más retrasadadados
Posts: 2845
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 6:27 am
Location: ¡Canadia!

Re: [2012-May-08] Glottal Stops.

Post by DonRetrasado »

So for the comic where that girl slits her wrists and that's the whole thing, I bet a lot of people were nonplussed about the whole situation that class.
Astrogirl wrote:Lethal, nobody wants to know about your herpes.
Lethal Interjection wrote:That's good to know. I can avoid a few awkward phone calls now.

User avatar
Sandwiches
[Insert In Mouth]
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:01 am

Re: [2012-May-08] Glottal Stops.

Post by Sandwiches »

I apologise I think I misrepresented the situation, it was only the ones to do with maths.

We never got to enjoy 631 for example

kevang
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue May 08, 2012 12:41 pm

Re: [2012-May-08] Glottal Stops.

Post by kevang »

DonRetrasado wrote:What's really bizarre, for me, is that linguists love shit like this. I've already seen a couple of facebook posts saying "yeah, the linguistics is wrong, but I LOVE this comic!" I think it's years of basically being ignored that cause us to get really excited whenever anyone remembers we exist. Most of the linguists I know actually really like SMBC. It's very mysterious.
Not so mysterious given that today was SMBC's first linguistics blooper. Wasn't it?

User avatar
Sandwiches
[Insert In Mouth]
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:01 am

Re: [2012-May-08] Glottal Stops.

Post by Sandwiches »

you have to admit though, that almost 1 in 5 SMBCs are not about linguistics

kevang
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue May 08, 2012 12:41 pm

Re: [2012-May-08] Glottal Stops.

Post by kevang »

More like 999 out of 1000.

User avatar
Edminster
Tested positive for Space-AIDS
Posts: 8835
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 9:53 pm
Location: Internet
Contact:

Re: [2012-May-08] Glottal Stops.

Post by Edminster »

kevang wrote:
DonRetrasado wrote:What's really bizarre, for me, is that linguists love shit like this. I've already seen a couple of facebook posts saying "yeah, the linguistics is wrong, but I LOVE this comic!" I think it's years of basically being ignored that cause us to get really excited whenever anyone remembers we exist. Most of the linguists I know actually really like SMBC. It's very mysterious.
Not so mysterious given that today was SMBC's first linguistics blooper. Wasn't it?
No, it isn't. Zach's pretty routinely just wrong enough on a variety of subjects to call down a horde of pedantic fuckwits on a regular basis, and linguistics is no exception.

If he stopped making comics about science, maths, and philosophy I think the number of shitlords descending upon this forum with their raucous cries of yeRONG yeRONG would decrease a hundredfold.
ol qwerty bastard wrote:bitcoin is backed by math, and math is intrinsically perfect and logically consistent always

gödel stop spreading fud

kevang
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue May 08, 2012 12:41 pm

Re: [2012-May-08] Glottal Stops.

Post by kevang »

Edminster wrote:linguistics is no exception.
Strange, I don't remember that. Where was he wrong about linguistics before?

kelly

Re: [2012-May-08] Glottal Stops.

Post by kelly »

Your examples are all voiceless alveolar stops.

Post Reply