SMBC Comics Forum

GUTCHUCKER wrote:I do not remember that at all. You are an insane platter of sandwiches.

I am not a sandwich, I am sandwiches. What does that mean? At what point are two separate sandwiches a group of sandwiches. I am the group

A mystery.

Sandwiches wrote:

GUTCHUCKER wrote:I do not remember that at all. You are an insane platter of sandwiches.

I am not a sandwich, I am sandwiches. What does that mean? At what point are two separate sandwiches a group of sandwiches. I am the group

A mystery.

Cucumber finger sandwiches |=

Spaceguy5 wrote:Cucumber finger sandwiches |=

I don't like to brag, but I am basically unbeatable at prod-the-candle.

So the lesson here is that if we whine about a comic being like a far side, he'll punish us with a graph comic.

Well, whoever called it out first knows who they are and can now hang their head(s) in shame. I skimmed the rules once a million years ago and even I know to leave Larson out of here. "The Far Side" is to "The Simpsons" as "a beaten dead horse" is to...?

Danthepianist wrote:whomsoever

No.

e: also you have the wrong case on your other 'who', lol
e2: no, the second who is correct (thanks Oldrac)

I think that 'who' is fine, because it's the predicate of "they are", but I'm open to the possibility that I'm wrong.

I think they should change the pronunciation of 'whom' to rhyme with 'bomb' so people stop thinking they sound more educated if they use it in all circumstances.

Oldrac the Chitinous wrote:I think that 'who' is fine, because it's the predicate of "they are", but I'm open to the possibility that I'm wrong.

Yeah, you're right, I forgot that 'to be' takes nominative case.

I continue to love this forum 150% as much as the comic.

I pronounce "Whom" like "bomb" because "hoom" sounds stupid. Whomp sounds stupid too, but less so.