ice2097 wrote:...seriously? do people not understand venn diagrams? the only use of "for reals" is the INTERSECTION of rap and discrete math?
jesus fucking christ....
Kimra wrote:Next they'll be denying us the right to say "We'll rape your arse if you don't come to this fucken country."
Lethal Interjection wrote:Or...
O .............................. o
You ............................ Sex
Astrogirl wrote:Lethal, nobody wants to know about your herpes.
Lethal Interjection wrote:That's good to know. I can avoid a few awkward phone calls now.
ice2097 wrote:...seriously? do people not understand venn diagrams? the only use of "for reals" is the INTERSECTION of rap and discrete math?
jesus fucking christ....
Sandwiches wrote:Well one interpretation of the venn diagram makes him correct, is the thing. Because that one interpretation is that the intersection means raps about discrete mathematics, but the phrase for reals should appear in every section.
However as we have addressed, it depends. Venn diagrams are kind of shit.
ice2097 wrote:...seriously? do people not understand venn diagrams? the only use of "for reals" is the INTERSECTION of rap and discrete math?
jesus fucking christ....
ur dumb wrote:
What he's saying is that the only thing that discrete math and rap have in common is the use of the phrase "for reals"
For reals.
Combinatorialist wrote:The phrase "for reals" never shows up in discrete math.
Sandwiches wrote:
Oooooh, I feel like I should correct him
but uh yeah I don't know anything. Do you know something? Do you know, for instance, know all discrete maths ever? Zach seemed to act like it appeared in set theory?
Everyone in this thread has been acting like for reals does at least exist in discrete maths, you are an outlier. I don't know if you are the valiant outsider, exposing our hypocrisies and putting us to shame or if you are a weirdo freakazoid who smells weird.
Combinatorialist wrote:Sandwiches wrote:
Oooooh, I feel like I should correct him
but uh yeah I don't know anything. Do you know something? Do you know, for instance, know all discrete maths ever? Zach seemed to act like it appeared in set theory?
Everyone in this thread has been acting like for reals does at least exist in discrete maths, you are an outlier. I don't know if you are the valiant outsider, exposing our hypocrisies and putting us to shame or if you are a weirdo freakazoid who smells weird.
I have a PhD in discrete math, so yeah, I do know a lot about it. Maybe some people have taken a class called "Discrete Math" and talked about the reals, but they don't belong there. Maybe Zach saw set theory, Cantor's Diagonal Proof, something like that in the class. I like the comics and thought it was odd that Zach would make a mistake like that, so I mentioned it to see what other people thought about it. Relax.
Return to Latest Comic Discussion 3: Revenge of the Son of Latest Comic Discussion 2
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests