[2012-May-17] Discrizzle

Blame Quintushalls for this.

Moderators: NeatNit, Kimra

Re: [17-05-2012] Discrizzle

Postby Sandwiches » Fri May 18, 2012 12:51 am

you've put the punchline at the top though
User avatar
Sandwiches
[Insert In Mouth]
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:01 am

Re: [17-05-2012] Discrizzle

Postby Combinatorialist » Fri May 18, 2012 1:29 am

ice2097 wrote:...seriously? do people not understand venn diagrams? the only use of "for reals" is the INTERSECTION of rap and discrete math?
jesus fucking christ....


If it's in the intersection then it's supposedly in both. Nobody in Discrete Math talks about the reals; they restrict themselves to mostly integers. Maybe "discrete math" should be replaced with "analysis".
Combinatorialist
 

Re: [17-05-2012] Discrizzle

Postby Lethal Interjection » Fri May 18, 2012 2:03 am

Or...



O .............................. o
You ............................ Sex
User avatar
Lethal Interjection
Death by Elocution
 
Posts: 8059
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 2:17 pm
Location: Behind your ear. It's magic!

Re: [17-05-2012] Discrizzle

Postby Apocalyptus » Fri May 18, 2012 2:23 am

This is relevant to my interests.

All of them.
Kimra wrote:Next they'll be denying us the right to say "We'll rape your arse if you don't come to this fucken country."
User avatar
Apocalyptus
Not what you were expecting
 
Posts: 5301
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 2:00 pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: [17-05-2012] Discrizzle

Postby DonRetrasado » Fri May 18, 2012 3:02 am

Lethal Interjection wrote:Or...



O .............................. o
You ............................ Sex

math is their only partner
Astrogirl wrote:Lethal, nobody wants to know about your herpes.

Lethal Interjection wrote:That's good to know. I can avoid a few awkward phone calls now.
User avatar
DonRetrasado
los más retrasadadados
 
Posts: 2845
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 6:27 am
Location: ¡Canada!

Re: [17-05-2012] Discrizzle

Postby Sandwiches » Fri May 18, 2012 8:13 am

Also, what if frequent use of the term for reals is not the title of the intersection, it's just an item. one of the things rap and discrete mathematics share.
User avatar
Sandwiches
[Insert In Mouth]
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:01 am

Re: [17-05-2012] Discrizzle

Postby Yoo-jin » Sun May 20, 2012 1:11 am

ice2097 wrote:...seriously? do people not understand venn diagrams? the only use of "for reals" is the INTERSECTION of rap and discrete math?
jesus fucking christ....


The intersection is a representation of all of the attributes the two circles share. Now the question is, because you questioned it, doesn't that mean you don't understand Venn diagrams?

(Although, people have pointed out that "for reals" might not be so common in discrete mathematics as the comic seems to suggest.)
Yoo-jin
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:40 am

Re: [17-05-2012] Discrizzle

Postby Sandwiches » Sun May 20, 2012 1:18 am

Well one interpretation of the venn diagram makes him correct, is the thing. Because that one interpretation is that the intersection means raps about discrete mathematics, but the phrase for reals should appear in every section.

However as we have addressed, it depends. Venn diagrams are kind of shit.
User avatar
Sandwiches
[Insert In Mouth]
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:01 am

Re: [17-05-2012] Discrizzle

Postby Lethal Interjection » Sun May 20, 2012 2:46 am

Sandwiches wrote:Well one interpretation of the venn diagram makes him correct, is the thing. Because that one interpretation is that the intersection means raps about discrete mathematics, but the phrase for reals should appear in every section.

However as we have addressed, it depends. Venn diagrams are kind of shit.


Ahh, but he does use the modifier 'frequent'.

I can't believe I'm defending a comic. A graph comic, no less.
User avatar
Lethal Interjection
Death by Elocution
 
Posts: 8059
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 2:17 pm
Location: Behind your ear. It's magic!

Re: [17-05-2012] Discrizzle

Postby ur dumb » Sun May 20, 2012 5:18 am

ice2097 wrote:...seriously? do people not understand venn diagrams? the only use of "for reals" is the INTERSECTION of rap and discrete math?
jesus fucking christ....



What he's saying is that the only thing that discrete math and rap have in common is the use of the phrase "for reals"

For reals.
ur dumb
 

Re: [17-05-2012] Discrizzle

Postby Combinatorialist » Sun May 20, 2012 5:14 pm

ur dumb wrote:
What he's saying is that the only thing that discrete math and rap have in common is the use of the phrase "for reals"

For reals.


But that doesn't make sense. The phrase "for reals" never shows up in discrete math. "Use of for reals" should be pointing to the section inside "rap music" but outside of "discrete math". I'm not sure how Zach missed that.
Combinatorialist
 

Re: [17-05-2012] Discrizzle

Postby Sandwiches » Sun May 20, 2012 6:05 pm

Combinatorialist wrote:The phrase "for reals" never shows up in discrete math.


Oooooh, I feel like I should correct him

but uh yeah I don't know anything. Do you know something? Do you know, for instance, know all discrete maths ever? Zach seemed to act like it appeared in set theory?

Everyone in this thread has been acting like for reals does at least exist in discrete maths, you are an outlier. I don't know if you are the valiant outsider, exposing our hypocrisies and putting us to shame or if you are a weirdo freakazoid who smells weird.
User avatar
Sandwiches
[Insert In Mouth]
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:01 am

Re: [17-05-2012] Discrizzle

Postby Combinatorialist » Sun May 20, 2012 7:45 pm

Sandwiches wrote:
Oooooh, I feel like I should correct him

but uh yeah I don't know anything. Do you know something? Do you know, for instance, know all discrete maths ever? Zach seemed to act like it appeared in set theory?

Everyone in this thread has been acting like for reals does at least exist in discrete maths, you are an outlier. I don't know if you are the valiant outsider, exposing our hypocrisies and putting us to shame or if you are a weirdo freakazoid who smells weird.


I have a PhD in discrete math, so yeah, I do know a lot about it. Maybe some people have taken a class called "Discrete Math" and talked about the reals, but they don't belong there. Maybe Zach saw set theory, Cantor's Diagonal Proof, something like that in the class. I like the comics and thought it was odd that Zach would make a mistake like that, so I mentioned it to see what other people thought about it. Relax.
Combinatorialist
 

Re: [17-05-2012] Discrizzle

Postby Sandwiches » Sun May 20, 2012 8:28 pm

NO YOU RELAX
User avatar
Sandwiches
[Insert In Mouth]
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:01 am

Re: [17-05-2012] Discrizzle

Postby Lethal Interjection » Sun May 20, 2012 9:51 pm

Combinatorialist wrote:
Sandwiches wrote:
Oooooh, I feel like I should correct him

but uh yeah I don't know anything. Do you know something? Do you know, for instance, know all discrete maths ever? Zach seemed to act like it appeared in set theory?

Everyone in this thread has been acting like for reals does at least exist in discrete maths, you are an outlier. I don't know if you are the valiant outsider, exposing our hypocrisies and putting us to shame or if you are a weirdo freakazoid who smells weird.


I have a PhD in discrete math, so yeah, I do know a lot about it. Maybe some people have taken a class called "Discrete Math" and talked about the reals, but they don't belong there. Maybe Zach saw set theory, Cantor's Diagonal Proof, something like that in the class. I like the comics and thought it was odd that Zach would make a mistake like that, so I mentioned it to see what other people thought about it. Relax.


Yeah... well... I have ultra-double PhD in Unproven Titles, where I wrote my thesis on the use of them in anonymous internet correspondence.
User avatar
Lethal Interjection
Death by Elocution
 
Posts: 8059
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 2:17 pm
Location: Behind your ear. It's magic!

PreviousNext

Return to Latest Comic Discussion 3: Revenge of the Son of Latest Comic Discussion 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 9 guests