[2012-May-31] Hippahkrussee

Blame Quintushalls for this.

Moderators: NeatNit, Kimra

User avatar
ChaoticBrain
[ASK] me about supple pony flanks
Posts: 230
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:26 am
Location: 404 - Sanity Not Found

[2012-May-31] Hippahkrussee

Post by ChaoticBrain »

http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db ... 2627#comic

In a way, I have to say that a person who "teaches the controversy" is worse than a person who espouses that all of evolution is a sham. At least the latter has a strong enough will to form an opinion; the former is so apathetic about the subject that she'll refuse to think critically about the points from either side.

User avatar
GUTCHUCKER
Gotchucker's less handsome twin
Posts: 2126
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 2:26 am
Location: Paradise City?

Re: [2012-May-31] Hippahkrussee

Post by GUTCHUCKER »

You know what's funny?
Comics.
You know what's just not funny at all?
Arguing semantics about comics.
Datanazush wrote:I ship Mohammed and Jehova.

User avatar
Sandwiches
[Insert In Mouth]
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:01 am

Re: [2012-May-31] Hippahkrussee

Post by Sandwiches »

Not every comic needs to be discussed.

User avatar
Lethal Interjection
Death by Elocution
Posts: 8051
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 2:17 pm
Location: Behind your ear. It's magic!
Contact:

Re: [2012-May-31] Hippahkrussee

Post by Lethal Interjection »

ChaoticBrain wrote: In a way, I have to say that a person who "teaches the controversy" is worse than a person who espouses that all of evolution is a sham. At least the latter has a strong enough will to form an opinion; the former is so apathetic about the subject that she'll refuse to think critically about the points from either side.
Whoa, whoa, whoa.
Hold on. Just because someone can teach it from an unbiased stance doesn't mean they don't have an opinion.

ThatLazyGuy

Re: [2012-May-31] Hippahkrussee

Post by ThatLazyGuy »

Yes, yes. We get it. You love evolution and don't understand the arguments against it.

I'm not saying that those arguments outweigh the evidence for evolution, just that these are not even close to the arguments against it.

And I get that you realized you have a little soapbox where you can spout all this stuff and you want to use it.

Now can you please make a comic that's actually, y'know, funny?

Guest

Re: [2012-May-31] Hippahkrussee

Post by Guest »

Lethal Interjection wrote:
ChaoticBrain wrote: In a way, I have to say that a person who "teaches the controversy" is worse than a person who espouses that all of evolution is a sham. At least the latter has a strong enough will to form an opinion; the former is so apathetic about the subject that she'll refuse to think critically about the points from either side.
Whoa, whoa, whoa.
Hold on. Just because someone can teach it from an unbiased stance doesn't mean they don't have an opinion.

If you think both sides are equal, regardless of the merit of their respective arguments, than you're not unbiased. You're just noncommittal.

That said, I don't find this comic funny. The joke was obvious from the second panel and was carried on way too long.

LonelyArtist
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 3:34 am

Re: [2012-May-31] Hippahkrussee

Post by LonelyArtist »

I actually pronounce controversy with a long O...

User avatar
Sandwiches
[Insert In Mouth]
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:01 am

Re: [2012-May-31] Hippahkrussee

Post by Sandwiches »

LonelyArtist wrote:I actually pronounce controversy with a long O...
I say a short O. What a world, eh?

anus mcgee

Re: [2012-May-31] Hippahkrussee

Post by anus mcgee »

ThatLazyGuy wrote:Yes, yes. We get it. You love evolution and don't understand the arguments against it.

I'm not saying that those arguments outweigh the evidence for evolution, just that these are not even close to the arguments against it.

And I get that you realized you have a little soapbox where you can spout all this stuff and you want to use it.

Now can you please make a comic that's actually, y'know, funny?
This, this, this, for God's sake this. You're giving me cancer, Zach.

User avatar
Lethal Interjection
Death by Elocution
Posts: 8051
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 2:17 pm
Location: Behind your ear. It's magic!
Contact:

Re: [2012-May-31] Hippahkrussee

Post by Lethal Interjection »

Guest wrote:
Lethal Interjection wrote:
ChaoticBrain wrote: In a way, I have to say that a person who "teaches the controversy" is worse than a person who espouses that all of evolution is a sham. At least the latter has a strong enough will to form an opinion; the former is so apathetic about the subject that she'll refuse to think critically about the points from either side.
Whoa, whoa, whoa.
Hold on. Just because someone can teach it from an unbiased stance doesn't mean they don't have an opinion.

If you think both sides are equal, regardless of the merit of their respective arguments, than you're not unbiased. You're just noncommittal.

That said, I don't find this comic funny. The joke was obvious from the second panel and was carried on way too long.
Who said anything about thinking the sides equal? You can teach stuff without thinking both sides are equal. I can debate for things that I don't really agree with. That doesn't make me noncommittal, it makes me intelligent.
I guess there are too many people who read this that are in the sciences...

User avatar
DonRetrasado
los más retrasadadados
Posts: 2845
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 6:27 am
Location: ¡Canadia!

Re: [2012-May-31] Hippahkrussee

Post by DonRetrasado »

ChaoticBrain wrote:In a way, I have to say that a person who "teaches the controversy" is worse than a person who espouses that all of evolution is a sham. At least the latter has a strong enough will to form an opinion; the former is so apathetic about the subject that she'll refuse to think critically about the points from either side.
What?
Astrogirl wrote:Lethal, nobody wants to know about your herpes.
Lethal Interjection wrote:That's good to know. I can avoid a few awkward phone calls now.

User avatar
Sandwiches
[Insert In Mouth]
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:01 am

Re: [2012-May-31] Hippahkrussee

Post by Sandwiches »

A lot of people put "having a wrong opinion" over "not having an opinion".

User avatar
sotic
[Insert Here]
Posts: 325
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 5:55 am
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Re: [2012-May-31] Hippahkrussee

Post by sotic »

Sandwiches wrote:A lot of people put "having a wrong opinion" over "not having an opinion".
Whenever I have trouble forming an opinion, I just flip a coin.
Wind catches lily / Scatt'ring petals to the wind: / Segmentation fault

User avatar
Lethal Interjection
Death by Elocution
Posts: 8051
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 2:17 pm
Location: Behind your ear. It's magic!
Contact:

Re: [2012-May-31] Hippahkrussee

Post by Lethal Interjection »

sotic wrote:
Sandwiches wrote:A lot of people put "having a wrong opinion" over "not having an opinion".
Whenever I have trouble forming an opinion, I just flip a coin.
And then what?

User avatar
Kimra
He-Man in a Miniskirt
Posts: 6853
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:18 am
Location: meanwhile elsewhere

Re: [2012-May-31] Hippahkrussee

Post by Kimra »

He ignores it, because deciding which opinion goes with which side of the coin is too hard.
King Prawn

Post Reply