y = 0x + 0.5

Two questions:Rockchurch wrote:You're all overthinking it.
y = 0x + 0.5
No, it's unanswerable, only if you choose to ignore the most obvious interpretation of 'emptiness'.Maze1125 wrote:As has already been explained, the question is unanswerable as it stands as "emptiness", as used, has not be clearly defined.
See above.Maze1125 wrote: 1) Why are you arbitrarily defining the area below the line as "not empty"? What has it been filled with?
Hahaha.Rockchurch wrote:You're all overthinking it.
y = 0x + 0.5
Fuck I read the thread before I posted this. Why I didn’t see two person had already give the same answer.Cocio_16 wrote:Why the hell the width of this graph would change ? It’s a constant. Thus, the emptiness will be a constant too.
a = width
b = emptiness
the values of the width and the emptiness equals whatever you want.
Put a point at (a,b).
A point as no width.
You get 100%
I see at least two options for "emptiness" neither of which is inherently more obvious than the other.Rockchurch wrote:No, it's unanswerable, only if you choose to ignore the most obvious interpretation of 'emptiness'.Maze1125 wrote:As has already been explained, the question is unanswerable as it stands as "emptiness", as used, has not be clearly defined.
[/quote]See above.Maze1125 wrote: 1) Why are you arbitrarily defining the area below the line as "not empty"? What has it been filled with?