[2013-May-17] Statistics
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 6:57 am
[2013-May-17] Statistics
I think a better reason would be people who bash people that play the lottery, but still buy insurance themselves.
Time to piss off people with logic and facts!
Re: [2013-05-17] Statistics
The combination of math and balls made me think of The Hairy Ball Theorem. Ball math!
- Lethal Interjection
- Death by Elocution
- Posts: 8048
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 2:17 pm
- Location: Behind your ear. It's magic!
- Contact:
Re: [2013-05-17] Statistics
Nope. It wouldn't.ReasonablyDoubtful wrote:I think a better reason would be people who bash people that play the lottery, but still buy insurance themselves.
Re: [2013-05-17] Statistics
The equivalent of playing the lottery in terms of "irrational conduct" is buying insurance on things you can afford to lose, like a computer monitor. Buying insurance on things you cannot afford to lose, like a house or a car, is perfectly reasonable. Hope this helps.
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 6:57 am
Re: [2013-05-17] Statistics
But how much does a lottery ticket cost? Surely you could easily take that into your budget without really losing anything, but winning the lottery means a complete change of your life. So it's an effective investment of nothing for a possible gain of, well... a whole hell of a lot.Sankara wrote:The equivalent of playing the lottery in terms of "irrational conduct" is buying insurance on things you can afford to lose, like a computer monitor. Buying insurance on things you cannot afford to lose, like a house or a car, is perfectly reasonable. Hope this helps.
And that's a good bet no matter how bad the odds are.
Which is the point of insurance.
Time to piss off people with logic and facts!
- Oldrac the Chitinous
- Chicken O' the Sea
- Posts: 3476
- Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 11:41 pm
- Location: The Perfect Stillness of the Deep
- Contact:
Re: [2013-05-17] Statistics
I'll Pascal's wager you in a minute.
Police said they spent some time working out if they could charge the man with being armed with a weapon, as technically he was armed with part of a fish.
- Lethal Interjection
- Death by Elocution
- Posts: 8048
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 2:17 pm
- Location: Behind your ear. It's magic!
- Contact:
Re: [2013-05-17] Statistics
And he'll do it, too.Oldrac the Chitinous wrote:I'll Pascal's wager you in a minute.
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 6:57 am
Re: [2013-05-17] Statistics
Essentially, yes, which is how both insurance and the lottery work: It's not about absolute dollar amounts, it's about effective loss and gain in terms of lifestyle.Anon wrote:So, a Pascal's Wager?
Time to piss off people with logic and facts!
Re: [2013-05-17] Statistics
"It will be worth it if we are able to save just one life"
I've heard this statement about gun control, and extra law enforcement powers. It's generally not true, saving just one life is not much of an accomplishment for sweeping legislation that costs millions of dollars and require effort or sacrifice from millions of people.
I've heard this statement about gun control, and extra law enforcement powers. It's generally not true, saving just one life is not much of an accomplishment for sweeping legislation that costs millions of dollars and require effort or sacrifice from millions of people.