[2014-05-04] Sad Baby

Blame Quintushalls for this.

Moderator: Kimra

[2014-05-04] Sad Baby

Postby Quentin » Mon May 05, 2014 6:36 pm

Quentin
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri May 02, 2014 4:30 pm

Re: [2014-05-04] Sad Baby

Postby Guest » Tue May 06, 2014 2:25 am

Eh... unless that's just a sig, I don't really see it. The ones linked to below are both similar to each other in that they both have to do with object permanence. This one is about a baby waxing philosophical. It's kind of a theme, but I wouldn't call it the same. The baby's thoughts don't even have anything to do with the game the Dad's playing this time (unless I missed something). Like I said, you can group it into a them of babies having deep thoughts or something like that, but it's not the same exact joke. Unless you read the joke in all 3 cases as "ha! ha! babies can't have grown up thoughts!" Come to think of it... that may not be an invalid interpretation.... :(
Guest
 

Re: [2014-05-04] Sad Baby

Postby Epoch Four » Tue May 06, 2014 8:57 am

Quentin is actually a baby and is offended by Zach's representation of babies.
User avatar
Epoch Four
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2013 5:12 am
Location: Apocalyptus

Re: [2014-05-04] Sad Baby

Postby Kimra » Tue May 06, 2014 12:01 pm

It's only because they're homobabies and not aimed at him.
King Prawn
User avatar
Kimra
He-Man in a Miniskirt
 
Posts: 6872
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:18 am
Location: meanwhile elsewhere

Re: [2014-05-04] Sad Baby

Postby Matt » Tue May 06, 2014 12:39 pm

I wouldn't call this so much a "joke" as a "crippling realization of existential horror".
Matt
 

Re: [2014-05-04] Sad Baby

Postby Quentin » Tue May 06, 2014 3:06 pm

Kimra wrote:It's only because they're homobabies and not aimed at him.

why are you so obsessed with me?
Quentin
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri May 02, 2014 4:30 pm

Re: [2014-05-04] Sad Baby

Postby Michele-Michel » Tue May 06, 2014 4:33 pm

Kimra wrote:homobabies


Is that like Muppet Babies? I remember when that cartoon was on the air.
User avatar
Michele-Michel
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 1:11 pm
Location: Here

Re: [2014-05-04] Sad Baby

Postby niahinti » Thu May 08, 2014 4:06 pm

He's not a baby though, he's clearly a banjo.
It's even stated right there in the comic. did you not read it?
niahinti
 


Return to Latest Comic Discussion 3: Revenge of the Son of Latest Comic Discussion 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests