http://www.smbc-comics.com/?id=3347
Oh man I like this comic.
It's almost as if this joke was never made before.
[2014-05-04] Sad Baby
Re: [2014-05-04] Sad Baby
Eh... unless that's just a sig, I don't really see it. The ones linked to below are both similar to each other in that they both have to do with object permanence. This one is about a baby waxing philosophical. It's kind of a theme, but I wouldn't call it the same. The baby's thoughts don't even have anything to do with the game the Dad's playing this time (unless I missed something). Like I said, you can group it into a them of babies having deep thoughts or something like that, but it's not the same exact joke. Unless you read the joke in all 3 cases as "ha! ha! babies can't have grown up thoughts!" Come to think of it... that may not be an invalid interpretation....
- Epoch Four
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2013 5:12 am
Re: [2014-05-04] Sad Baby
Quentin is actually a baby and is offended by Zach's representation of babies.
- Kimra
- He-Man in a Miniskirt
- Posts: 6850
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:18 am
- Location: meanwhile elsewhere
Re: [2014-05-04] Sad Baby
I wouldn't call this so much a "joke" as a "crippling realization of existential horror".
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2014 4:30 pm
Re: [2014-05-04] Sad Baby
why are you so obsessed with me?Kimra wrote:It's only because they're homobabies and not aimed at him.
- Michele-Michel
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 1:11 pm
- Location: Here
Re: [2014-05-04] Sad Baby
Is that like Muppet Babies? I remember when that cartoon was on the air.Kimra wrote:homobabies
Re: [2014-05-04] Sad Baby
He's not a baby though, he's clearly a banjo.
It's even stated right there in the comic. did you not read it?
It's even stated right there in the comic. did you not read it?