SMBC Comics Forum

http://www.smbc-comics.com/?id=3408



Yeah, yeah, we get it, genius. How cleverly subverted! I'm in awe.

Jesus Christ.

I love asteroids too. Fuck yeah!

Pfft, like Hollywood would ever pair a white woman with a black man.

WE SHALL NOT MIX THE RACES

Hey, the comic was boring and all, but at least Zach didn't take 2 years and 150000 dollars to deliver it.

Wow are nerds still bitter about this? Not only did it cost to much of money you didn't spend but takes too much time for her to release videos you don't like either? What are you even trying to say?

That she's unprofessional? I like it point it out because it's funny, but that's me.

What do you know, she really was superfluous.

Anita Sarkeesian is a bitch! There, I´ve said it. Did it make me feel better? No, not really. But she is a bitch. Not only a bitch, but a real c*nt too. I am sorry, but the worst descriptive words you can find on women would probably fit her perfectly. Perhaps with the exception of degrading words describing women of promiscuous nature. Anita Sarkeesian seems to be such a cold fish that I doubt that she enjoys any physical relation what so ever. Least of all with a man.

Listen, Zach can't possibly really be Anita Sarkeesian.

Because then the comic would be funny, like, at least once or twice.

Oldrac the Chitinous wrote:What do you know, she really was superfluous.

Saddest SMBC Redux.

Andy wrote:Anita Sarkeesian is a bitch! There, I´ve said it. Did it make me feel better? No, not really. But she is a bitch. Not only a bitch, but a real c*nt too. I am sorry, but the worst descriptive words you can find on women would probably fit her perfectly. Perhaps with the exception of degrading words describing women of promiscuous nature. Anita Sarkeesian seems to be such a cold fish that I doubt that she enjoys any physical relation what so ever. Least of all with a man.

yeah, because she's doesn't seem sexually available an is also a woman, we can disregard her opinions and insult her personally!

Take that feminism!

ya wn wrote:

Andy wrote:Anita Sarkeesian is a bitch! There, I´ve said it. Did it make me feel better? No, not really. But she is a bitch. Not only a bitch, but a real c*nt too. I am sorry, but the worst descriptive words you can find on women would probably fit her perfectly. Perhaps with the exception of degrading words describing women of promiscuous nature. Anita Sarkeesian seems to be such a cold fish that I doubt that she enjoys any physical relation what so ever. Least of all with a man.

yeah, because she's doesn't seem sexually available an is also a woman, we can disregard her opinions and insult her personally!

Take that feminism!

(Emphasis mine).

Actually, he is pretty much saying that since she (alledgedly) isn't sexually available, she should not have insults of such nature directed at her.
Also, the whole ideology of feminism isn't even mentioned by Andy, aside from the fact that Sarkeesian is a self-identified feminist and also, in Andy's words, "a bitch". Are you saying criticism towards a member of the group is to be expanded to the rest of the group? Are you saying all feminists share Sarkeesian's characteristics and mindset? Are you saying feminism encourages the behaviour Anita has been displaying in the internet (i.e. rant on youtube about videogames she clearly knows nothing about, fail to deliver on the promises she made to her fundraisers, etc)?

Because if you do any of the above, honestly, I'd think you mischaracterize feminism in a terrible light and would consider you pretty much an "anti-feminist".
Take that feminism, indeed.

Lupk wrote:Actually, he is pretty much saying that since she (alledgedly) isn't sexually available, she should not have insults of such nature directed at her.
Also, the whole ideology of feminism isn't even mentioned by Andy, aside from the fact that Sarkeesian is a self-identified feminist and also, in Andy's words, "a bitch". Are you saying criticism towards a member of the group is to be expanded to the rest of the group? Are you saying all feminists share Sarkeesian's characteristics and mindset? Are you saying feminism encourages the behaviour Anita has been displaying in the internet (i.e. rant on youtube about videogames she clearly knows nothing about, fail to deliver on the promises she made to her fundraisers, etc)?

Because if you do any of the above, honestly, I'd think you mischaracterize feminism in a terrible light and would consider you pretty much an "anti-feminist".
Take that feminism, indeed.

Want to try that again in English? I'm pretty sure it wasn't English because it made no sense.

Kimra wrote:Want to try that again in English? I'm pretty sure it wasn't English because it made no sense.

There are a few typos and I'm guessing a little bit of grammar abuse, but it should be perfectly understandable considering you probably see these abuses everyday. But fine.
TL;DR Anita is X does not imply feminism is X. And there is nothing there that says "Sarkeesian is being criticized based on her sex life/choices".