[2014-07-09] Looks like someone's read Forge of God

Blame Quintushalls for this.

Moderator: Kimra

[2014-07-09] Looks like someone's read Forge of God

Postby fancybone » Wed Jul 09, 2014 3:07 pm

So, uh, spoiler alert but Forge of God and Anvil of the Stars strongly feature "trap species" - artificial creations meant to lull humanity into a false sense of security. A great pair of books, which I highly recommend, despite spoiling one aspect of both of them. (And the second one is kind of ambiguous on the topic, anyway.)
User avatar
fancybone
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 2:17 pm

Re: [2014-07-09] Looks like someone's read Forge of God

Postby ReasonablyDoubtful » Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:51 pm

Yeah, yeah, yeah. Humans are horrible, and yet, statistically, any individual you meet is highly unlikely to actually be someone that cheats, steals, kills, etc.

And, usually, the justification for the first two involve the same view of the world that Weiner espouses: That you'd be likely to do it to them, so they're justified in doing it to you. In other words: It's not a crime when it's against a criminal.

The church donation plate is actually a perfect example of this. An extremely significant number of people put into these donations plates when they go to church, but how many people take from it?
Time to piss off people with logic and facts!
ReasonablyDoubtful
 
Posts: 105
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 6:57 am

Re: [2014-07-09] Looks like someone's read Forge of God

Postby Lethal Interjection » Thu Jul 10, 2014 12:23 am

ReasonablyDoubtful wrote:Yeah, yeah, yeah. Humans are horrible, and yet, statistically, any individual you meet is highly unlikely to actually be someone that cheats, steals, kills, etc.

And, usually, the justification for the first two involve the same view of the world that Weiner espouses: That you'd be likely to do it to them, so they're justified in doing it to you. In other words: It's not a crime when it's against a criminal.

The church donation plate is actually a perfect example of this. An extremely significant number of people put into these donations plates when they go to church, but how many people take from it?


To deal with the last question first. They exist. They might be a small(ish) percentage, but they exist. I actually had an old acquaintance who was in insurance, and dealt with a large group of churches. Their insurance was actually somewhat determinate on the type of collection plates they use. To use two examples, the standard plate (basically like a bigger pie-dish) had a higher rate of insurance than the ones with bags attached to what kind of look like old-timey ship's wheels. Simply because the latter is far more conspicuous to steal from, whereas the former requires only the most basic sleight of hand.

As for the first part, I think it is highly likely that you meet a cheater, and perhaps slightly likely that you meet someone who steals. It is just that their cheating/stealing is not of a particular societal significance.
User avatar
Lethal Interjection
Death by Elocution
 
Posts: 8052
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 2:17 pm
Location: Behind your ear. It's magic!

Re: [2014-07-09] Looks like someone's read Forge of God

Postby ReasonablyDoubtful » Thu Jul 10, 2014 6:46 am

Lethal Interjection wrote:They exist. They might be a small(ish) percentage, but they exist.


I do not doubt that, but that's like saying that dark-colored peppered moths should be taken as going with the grain of evolution as opposed to against it. They're the minority of the species for a reason: dark colors show up really well against birch trees. Similarly, because humans are social animals, people like that are not a product of evolution, but rather anomalies, much like dark-colored peppered moths.
Time to piss off people with logic and facts!
ReasonablyDoubtful
 
Posts: 105
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 6:57 am

Re: [2014-07-09] Looks like someone's read Forge of God

Postby Apocalyptus » Thu Jul 10, 2014 11:32 am

I'm pretty sure human social behaviour is a tiny bit more complicated than the physical characteristics of a moth. I'm not sure it is a valid comparison.
Kimra wrote:Next they'll be denying us the right to say "We'll rape your arse if you don't come to this fucken country."
User avatar
Apocalyptus
Not what you were expecting
 
Posts: 5297
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 2:00 pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: [2014-07-09] Looks like someone's read Forge of God

Postby Kaharz » Thu Jul 10, 2014 11:52 am

ReasonablyDoubtful wrote:The church donation plate is actually a perfect example of this. An extremely significant number of people put into these donations plates when they go to church, but how many people take from it?


Not a very good example in my opinion. In the case of the church donation plate you have a very high social pressure to put money in. You are being a good member of the group and you are rewarded by being allowed to be part of the group. You also have a fairly high risk of getting caught and low reward when it comes to taking money out.

I don't disagree with the actual point. Most people are relatively 'good.' Or at least not bad. They may lie frequently, but probably mostly for their own aggrandizement. I would guess a lot of people cheat or steal in very small ways, such as conducting personal business while they are at work. Or taking eleven items through the ten items or less checkout line. But yea, most people don't murder, rape, commit large amounts of theft, et cetera.

Of course the question is, why do people behave that way. Are they inherently good, are they socially conditioned, is it something else? I don't think it is a debate anyone can convincingly resolve. There are people on the extremes who say that people are inherently selfish and are capable of anything for their own gain and it is only the risk of punishment and social conditioning that keeps them check. There are of course people on the other side that claim people are inherently good and are corrupted by society or other outside influences. There are also a crap ton of studies on it, but it is impossible to control enough of the variables to get a decent generalized validity.
Kaharz wrote:I don't need a title. I have no avatar or tagline either. I am unique in my lack of personal identifiers.
User avatar
Kaharz
This Intentionally Left Blank
 
Posts: 1572
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 12:17 pm

Re: [2014-07-09] Looks like someone's read Forge of God

Postby Lethal Interjection » Thu Jul 10, 2014 10:05 pm

I agree with both Apoc and Kaharz. With the example of the collection plate (or really any charitable giving situation). There is a societal pressure to give, and thus a negative to take. But the needs or compulsions to steal that money are there all the time. I've seen a collection plate go by, or a donation jar/bin, and thought, 'boy, I could really use that money'. Have I taken it? No. But I do have to go through a moral filter to do so.

I don't think that dark colored pepper moths have any choice in their appearance.
User avatar
Lethal Interjection
Death by Elocution
 
Posts: 8052
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 2:17 pm
Location: Behind your ear. It's magic!


Return to Latest Comic Discussion 3: Revenge of the Son of Latest Comic Discussion 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests