[2016-11-02] naming-trends

Blame Quintushalls for this.

Moderators: NeatNit, Kimra


jjjiiimmm

Re: [2016-11-02] naming-trends

Post by jjjiiimmm »

I love the pundits. They should be only allowed on based on past truthful performance and should be hooked to a polygraph with electroshock feedback.

Guest

Re: [2016-11-02] naming-trends

Post by Guest »

this is just tikki tikki tembo no sa rembo chari bari ruchi pip peri pembo

User avatar
Sahan
"I promise you no penis jokes."
Posts: 4361
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 6:20 am
Location: Perth, Australia
Contact:

Re: [2016-11-02] naming-trends

Post by Sahan »

Oh boy, you're going to be in a world of trouble if you ever fall down a well.
Destructicus wrote: Alt text:
"I wonder if chemists feel bad that they're always left out of these sorts of jokes."

Since when is chemistry not a science?

User avatar
Apocalyptus
Not what you were expecting
Posts: 5278
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 2:00 pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: [2016-11-02] naming-trends

Post by Apocalyptus »

jjjiiimmm wrote:I love the pundits. They should be only allowed on based on past truthful performance and should be hooked to a polygraph with electroshock feedback.
That's assuming polygraphs measure if someone is telling the truth, which they don't.
Kimra wrote:Next they'll be denying us the right to say "We'll rape your arse if you don't come to this fucken country."

Post Reply