by Quintushalls » Fri May 20, 2011 3:20 am
Edminster wrote:oh my god you are a colossal nerd
e: and not in the good way
ha ha. I figured it is something you can do in your head on the fly, and no need to calculate the test statistic. I would gage her values, but I thought that would be too nerdy, even though it would help figure if my performance was improving over time. It would have been more nerdy to use the equation if the number of partners were 1. How pleasurable sex is, I believe, is hard to figure out without some kind of standards of measure.
Apocalyptus wrote:Plus, ten minutes as the maximum measurable time achievement? Really?
I was thinking on a scale, but yeah, let's make it any amount.
[quote="Edminster"]oh my god you are a colossal nerd
e: and not in the good way[/quote]
ha ha. I figured it is something you can do in your head on the fly, and no need to calculate the test statistic. I would gage her values, but I thought that would be too nerdy, even though it would help figure if my performance was improving over time. It would have been more nerdy to use the equation if the number of partners were 1. How pleasurable sex is, I believe, is hard to figure out without some kind of standards of measure.
[quote="Apocalyptus"]Plus, ten minutes as the maximum measurable time achievement? Really?[/quote]
I was thinking on a scale, but yeah, let's make it any amount.