[2019-02-13] Logic Gates

Post a reply

This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :?: :idea: :| (o~o) :geek: :[] :geek2: :][>:=~+:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review

Expand view Topic review: [2019-02-13] Logic Gates

Re: [2019-02-13] Logic Gates

by NeatNit » Fri Feb 15, 2019 4:57 pm

Well don't I feel silly now. I guess this is the level of non-commitment I should expect from Zach.

Re: [2019-02-13] Logic Gates

by BloodGain » Fri Feb 15, 2019 4:52 pm

Nah, it's just techno-babble. For example, "two-thirds adder" is just a joke on half-adders and full-adders, and a NOT-NAND isn't a real gate (it's technically an AND, I guess?). The diagram is also full of pseudo-gates, most of the gates that should take 2 inputs (if they were real) only have 1 path leading in, and many of the paths are nonsensical or converge without logic gates to combine them.

[2019-02-13] Logic Gates

by NeatNit » Wed Feb 13, 2019 4:52 pm




If you can do logic gates in your head, please check to confirm you aren't a replicant. Thank you.

Can anyone check whether the description and the diagram match, and whether they actually do subtraction?