Page 2 of 4
Re: Underwater Pornography
Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:41 am
by FengharTheNord
Neglected Shoe wrote:Underwater Awesomeness
THAT ROCKS.
I wish I had a camera like that.
Re: Underwater Pornography
Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:10 pm
by Rainbow
AHMETxRock wrote:Oh, is that why Rainbow added me on facebook?
Gross. I'm way to old for you.
When I think of Ahmet I think of someone who is both sexually attractive and someone anyone would ever want to be within three feet of.
Re: Underwater Pornography
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 4:11 pm
by Kimra
Rainbow wrote:AHMETxRock wrote:Oh, is that why Rainbow added me on facebook?
Gross. I'm way to old for you.
When I think of Ahmet I think of someone who is both sexually attractive and someone
no-one would ever want to be within three feet of.
Fix'd. I'm sorry.
Re: Underwater Pornography
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 4:38 pm
by Cirtur
I thought they had sarcasm in Australia.
Re: Underwater Pornography
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 4:48 pm
by Kimra
Cirtur wrote:I thought they had sarcasm in Australia.
In that case:
Rainbow wrote:When I think of Ahmet I think of someone who is both sexually attractive and someone everyone would always want to be within three feet of.
Fix'd x2
Re: Underwater Pornography
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 6:17 pm
by AHMETxRock
I am not aware of this sarcasm that you all speak of, but thank you all for the compliments!
Re: Underwater Pornography
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 8:35 pm
by Kimra
Sarcasm, the lowest form of wit.
Ahmet doesn't get the lowest form of wit.
Ahmet is not witty.
Being witty is funny.
Conclusion: Ahmet is not funny.
(I like my logic!)
Re: Underwater Pornography
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 8:46 pm
by LordRetard
You're denying the antecedent!!
Re: Underwater Pornography
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 9:02 pm
by Cirtur
Kimra wrote:Being witty is funny.]
You are assuming that the only funny comes from wit.
Re: Underwater Pornography
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 9:05 pm
by LordRetard
Begging the question!
Re: Underwater Pornography
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 11:48 pm
by Phoenix
Kimra wrote:Sarcasm, the lowest form of wit.
Ahmet doesn't get the lowest form of wit.
Ahmet is not witty.
Being witty is funny.
Conclusion: Ahmet is not funny.
(I like my logic!)
There is a problem here. Ahmet's last forum battle WAS funny. Has he created a paradox by creating a funny comic? Will the world be destroyed?
Tune in next week to find out, if the world is still here!
Re: Underwater Pornography
Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:33 am
by Kimra
Clearly Ahmet used the monkeys stored in his attic to write that. As my logic is flawless.
Cirtur wrote:You are assuming that the only funny comes from wit.
Of course.
Re: Underwater Pornography
Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:42 am
by Cirtur
Really? What about if someone falls over, in a most hilarious manner?
What about a man, clutching a piece of soil to his heart as he screams the name of his beloved down an iron tube?
Is that funny? IS THAT FUNNY?
Re: Underwater Pornography
Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:51 am
by Kimra
No.
Though your post is funny... but I'm still calling that wit.
Re: Underwater Pornography
Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:55 am
by AHMETxRock
I'm pretty sure there is a difference between wit and funny. Both are amusing and can make someone laugh, but still...