SMBC Comics Forum

http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&id=2272

That anti-spam question was a little strange.

Anyway, I don't get the comic, but there it is.

Many physicists are studying subatomic particles, which means they can work with one atom at a time.

Chemists study the interactions between atoms to form molecules (chemicals).

Biologists study the effects of said chemicals on life. (See also: Abiogenesis.)

The moral of the story is that physicists are dicks.

I'm have little interest in science, but I actually thought this one was kind of clever.

Meh wrote:That anti-spam question was a little strange.

I'd say it works, but

Eisbreaker wrote:The moral of the story is that physicists are dicks.

Quantum dickballs.

Eisbreaker wrote:The moral of the story is that physicists are dicks.

My physics professor used to be a researcher. When this came up in class, a student said something along the lines of, "It must be awesome working with a lot of really smart people." The prof's response was, "No it was horrible. Physicists are arrogant jerks. They never listen to what anyone else says and think everyone else is an idiot, even other PhDs. They almost all act like they are the only one who actually understands physics. That is why I left research to teach, I hated almost everyone I worked with."

Plus, they probably could never understand physics as well as he did.

Kind of remind me of that:

Me too but I didn't dare to bring it up in fear of being lynched.

Eisbreaker wrote:Me too but I didn't dare to bring it up in fear of being lynched.

You are a quick study.

She's still less annoying than Munroe.

I can say that science can be quite interesting with the right approach. Not so long ago, I had to write an essay on why vaping is bad, and thanks to https://studymoose.com/free-essays/why-vaping-is-bad, it didn't take me long to find interesting points. Doing your research can be time-consuming, but it's not that boring, to be honest. But I guess it depends on a person.