Page 4 of 5

Re: Dirty Limericks.

Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 3:06 am
by Edminster
Hopefully in the counting part so that he sees he wrote a 5-8-5 instead of a 5-7-5.

Re: Dirty Limericks.

Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 3:08 am
by AHMETxRock
1. Line
2. Line
3. Line
4. Line
5. that's
6. four
7. times

Re: Dirty Limericks.

Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 3:15 am
by Edminster
Ah! I see what happened. I counted "that's" as 'that is'.

Re: Dirty Limericks.

Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 3:16 am
by Oldrac the Chitinous
BULLETIN BULLETIN BULLETIN

This is now the Dirty Rondeau thread.

Re: Dirty Limericks.

Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 8:54 am
by GreenCrayon
A rondeau. It's dirty because the subject matter is Ahmet, whom I hate.

I hate Ahmet with all my heart,
From where I saw his buttocks part,
I could not hide from his mad grin,
I want to punch his face right in,
And forget the smell of his fart.

He dresses like a poor French tart,
He cannot play Mario Kart,
He's ugly underneath the skin,
I hate Ahmet.

Why did this hatred ever start?
I read his posts, that played its part,
And now I can't ignore the din,
His breath smells like its made of sin,
I sorely wish he would depart,
I hate Ahmet.

Re: Dirty Limericks.

Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 4:35 pm
by AHMETxRock
That was pretty good, actually. I'd write up a response right now, but in ten minutes I'm attending a seminar in which I become magically qualified to work.
Also, I've had my poems published. I'm qualified to judge the integrity of people's writings, you see.

Re: Dirty Limericks.

Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:21 pm
by ruotwocone
AHMETxRock wrote:That was pretty good, actually. I'd write up a response right now, but in ten minutes I'm attending a seminar in which I become magically qualified to work.
Also, I've had my poems published. I'm qualified to judge the integrity of people's writings, you see.
didn't we already have a discussion about scam poetry publications on this forum?

Re: Dirty Limericks.

Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 11:24 pm
by Lethal Interjection
ruotwocone wrote:
AHMETxRock wrote:That was pretty good, actually. I'd write up a response right now, but in ten minutes I'm attending a seminar in which I become magically qualified to work.
Also, I've had my poems published. I'm qualified to judge the integrity of people's writings, you see.
didn't we already have a discussion about scam poetry publications on this forum?
We did indeed. I think he just covered his ears and screamed "I'm not listening, I'm not listening!"

Re: Dirty Limericks.

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 11:53 am
by Kimra
There once was a man named Dick,
He was a gynormous prick,
Standing up to his name,
Was an impossible aim,
So he settled for the telling, Quick.

Re: Dirty Limericks.

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 1:02 pm
by Sahan
That last line was a bit awkward, I don't really get it.

Re: Dirty Limericks.

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 1:07 pm
by Kimra
It's late, I made it up. Find your own meaning, any real poetry works that way anyway.

Re: Dirty Limericks.

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 1:40 pm
by Lethal Interjection
Also, prink doesn't rhyme with quick or Dick.

Re: Dirty Limericks.

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 4:38 pm
by mountainmage
Lethal Interjection wrote:Also, prink doesn't rhyme with quick or Dick.
REAL poetry doesn't have to rhyme, or so Kimra would have us believe.

Re: Dirty Limericks.

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 10:21 pm
by Kimra
That's a typo. It should be prick.

Re: Dirty Limericks.

Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2009 12:16 am
by mountainmage
No need to point it out, ya prink!