[2013-Jan-08]
- Trout Fucker
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:02 pm
Re: 08-Jan 2013
It's out now. Weak punchline and doesn't flow well either like it's missing panels. It starts to go to shit when the guy begins a monologue about the flaws of mass surveillance and it devolves in to some insubstantial rambling to which the robot does not acknowledge but confirms he is hiding something. Then in a totally unexpected wacky turn of events our protagonist reveals that he had in fact been recording their "conversation" the entire time which robot claims invades his privacy. The entirety of the joke being that the robot was unaware of his hypocrisy.
Honestly this might be the worst smcb I have ever read.
Honestly this might be the worst smcb I have ever read.
- nobody
- [Insert Here]
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2012 8:36 pm
Re: 08-Jan 2013
I think it was a drone not a robot
Re: 08-Jan 2013
I wouldn't say this is the worst SMBC, or even the most preachy, but it is poor quality and Zach is seriously soap boxing here. This is aside from the issues with the argument in the first place.
- nobody
- [Insert Here]
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2012 8:36 pm
Re: 08-Jan 2013
the person who finds the most recent good smbc wins a prize
Re: 08-Jan 2013
Last panel is meh (aside from the so-so joke, there's no reason for the guy to record the conversation, or for the drone to care about that at all since the "conversation" isn't incriminating), but I really liked how the drone reacts to the guy's rant.
Also, I like how he made the drone cute. With a different punchline, it could have been a good comic...
Also, I like how he made the drone cute. With a different punchline, it could have been a good comic...
Re: 08-Jan 2013
Actually in Illinois, until a very recent court decision, it was illegal to record police officers without their consent.
Re: 08-Jan 2013
and it was enforced whenever convenient to the officers.luco chimache wrote:Actually in Illinois, until a very recent court decision, it was illegal to record police officers without their consent.
Re: [2013-Jan-08]
Actually sound, great, fact-filled details the following. The content Don't ever fail, understanding that undoubtedly is valid the following at the same time. An individual constantly lead to an appealing examine. Is it possible to notify Now i'm pleased?: )#) Maintain the nice posts. discoverynew
Re: [2013-Jan-08]
Whoa! Precisely what a close look opener this specific article have been to me. A lot loved, added, My spouse and i can’t loose time waiting for additional! limitlessweb.online
Re: [2013-Jan-08]
Attractive blog post, the nation's a truly nice web log that you have got these, compete the best get the job done, can be once again. mktpulse99
Re: [2013-Jan-08]
Regards for the purpose of post this amazing piece of writing! I recently came across yuor web blog perfect for your preferences. It includes marvelous not to mention advantageous items. Cultivate monetary management give good results! stepdeck dispatch
Re: [2013-Jan-08]
I read that Post and got it fine and informative.ทางเข้า ufabet มือถือ https://www.ufabetwins.info/ทางเข้าufabet/
Re: [2013-Jan-08]
You could be allowed to put up manufacturers, except for shortcuts, in the event that they've been recognized not to mention concerning content. tubidy music